Laserfiche WebLink
So for all those reasons, because Parker Ranch easily agreed and they said that their application, in <br />their application, they were only going to use the existing facility so they had no problem with the <br />condition saying it would stay within the remaining facilities, they had no problem building an <br />alternative driveway access, which would relieve the traffic problems, and most importantly they <br />deleted the special events facility, which I’ll tell you in my research that’s an urban use and, you <br />know, to do that kind of facility, they should have, in my opinion, should have gone through a <br />boundary amendment and rezoning, but since they agreed to all of these things, my clients are <br />satisfied and will support the application at this time. <br />GIFFIN: Thank you. Commissioners, any questions of Ms. Song? Well, personally, I’d like to <br />congratulate both of you for coming to this kind of conclusion. I personally feel that this kind of, <br />you know, negotiations between two parties, that’s critical to the success of how we go about our <br />business. And so, again, I congratulate the Ranch and the Hirayamas for this kind of negotiation. <br />Thank you. So any other comments or questions? Commissioners, I’d like you to please take a <br />look at the revised recommendations, as Maija said, in the light yellow that was distributed to us, so <br />that we know what we are speaking of. And Julie has just shown me that there is no one here in the <br />public who came to testify, thank goodness. So if there are no other comments, do I hear a motion? <br />Commissioner Bowman. <br />BOWMAN: I move that we approve Parker Ranch, Inc, special permit application, SPP 10-108, <br />with the changes to Condition 6 and Condition 7. I think that’s it. <br />GIFFIN: We added No. 3. Do we have to state that in the motion? <br />COTTLE: No. Condition 3, I had just pointed out that it was not in the original recommendation <br />but it has been added to the revised recommendation. <br />GIFFIN: Right. Okay, then we are just concerned about Condition No. 6 and No. 7, correct? <br />COTTLE: That’s correct. <br />GIFFIN: All right. Do I hear a second? <br />NELSON: Second. <br />GIFFIN: Commissioner Nelson. It has been moved by Commissioner Bowman and seconded by <br />Commissioner Nelson that we approve the special permit application, SPP 10-108. Any discussion? <br />Hearing none, Maija? <br />COTTLE: Thank you, Madam Chairman. Commissioner Bowman? <br />BOWMAN: Aye. <br />COTTLE: Commissioner Nelson? <br />NELSON: Aye. <br />COTTLE: Commissioner Hickcox? <br />14 <br />EXHIBIT A <br /> <br />