My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2009-01-15 THAWAIIAN RAINFOREST
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Leeward/Windward Planning Commission
>
Minutes & Exhibits Transcripts
>
2003-2022 Exhibits Transcripts
>
2009
>
2009-01-15 THAWAIIAN RAINFOREST
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/13/2011 9:15:25 AM
Creation date
6/13/2011 9:15:16 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
41
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Company. Shipman didn’t own those railroad rights-of-way. So these are, there are three breaks <br />in Milo Street that title is in question. Now I don’t want to bore you with that. But, in effect, <br />Shipman did not own those railroad rights-of-way so they had no legal ability to convey an <br />easement over those railroad rights-of-way. And it’s a legal issue; and frankly I don’t think the <br />Land Court can resolve it. I think it’s going to have to be resolved in Circuit Court, if it goes that <br />far. <br />I would like to let the Commission know that Shipman has been negotiating with the applicant <br />since the last Planning Commission hearing to try to resolve these issues in a good faith manner. <br />So it’s not that Shipman is attempting to deny the applicant any use of its property. But Shipman <br />has some serious concerns, one of which -. And shifting from the legal issue which I know you <br />guys don’t have the authority to resolve, but getting to the planning issue which is your <br />jurisdiction, Milo Street is not adequate to handle Limited Industrial uses. As I understand it for <br />Limited Industrial you need a 60-foot right-of-way and at least a 32-foot wide paving. Milo <br />Street varies in width, the paving somewhere in the 20-foot range. So Shipman as the owner of <br />the roadway has serious concerns with respect to liability, safety, if the use in that area is <br />increased to Limited Industrial 1-acre, which means you could have 10 separate Limited <br />Industrial lots on this property. And it’s a real concern on Shipman’s part. <br />The other aspect of it is, I think Mr. Yeh has gone over this and I don’t want to belabor the <br />arguments that Shipman has presented, but the Community Development Plan designates this <br />area for Agriculture, not Industrial. And the infrastructure is inadequate to have this area utilized <br />for Industrial uses. It appears Commissioner Woodward would like to ask me a question. <br />WOODWARD: Only if you are through. <br />MOORE: No, I’m fine. <br />WOODWARD: Okay. <br />WATANABE: Go ahead, Mr. Woodward. <br />WOODWARD: Chairman, thank you. What is the acreage of the Shipman Industrial Park? <br />MOORE: I don’t have that, I can get that information to you. You’re talking about <br />the Shipman Business Park? <br />WOODWARD: Right. <br />MOORE: Yeah. No, it’s, I don’t know. Unfortunately Mr. Walter is not here. <br />WOODWARD: Okay. <br />MOORE: But we can get that information to you. <br />WOODWARD: Well, let me just ask a pointed question. This is right across the street <br />from where the Shipman Industrial Park is; and I get the impression that perhaps this is <br /> EXHIBIT A <br />9 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.