My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2004-01-16 Western United Life
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Leeward/Windward Planning Commission
>
Minutes & Exhibits Transcripts
>
2003-2022 Exhibits Transcripts
>
2004
>
2004-01-16 Western United Life
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/13/2011 9:17:18 AM
Creation date
6/13/2011 9:17:13 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
33
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
through the County Council, we could still -, we will still participate and take some -, see if we <br />can address some of the concerns now that we would have the recommended conditions of <br />approval and the recommendation by the Planning Commission, that we have a little firmer <br />basis to discuss this with them and we will continue to do so. <br />SPRINGER:Thank you. Thanks. <br />FUJIKAWA:Okay. Is there any other questions, Commissioners? Graham. <br />GRAHAM:Notwithstanding the response that Hannah got, given what we heard <br />today, I would be in favor of having a continuance for one more meeting. I don't want to <br />draw it out because we're not the action body, the Council is the action body, however, I think <br />we are kind of the primary body for taking public testimony, even though the public can testify <br />before the Council. And so given what we've heard, plus the extent of the changes which <br />Chris is working away on and the whole digestion of the project, I would certainly be in favor <br />of a continuance for another month. I'd like to hear how the rest of the Commission feels <br />about that. <br />FUJIKAWA:Any other questions? McCall. <br />MCCALL:Well, maybe just as comments. I'm uneasy about this project. I guess <br />my primary questions here are it does seem to me to be somewhat up in the air. I know this is <br />sort of the way that these things are done. Now I would much rather say, you know, hey, this <br />is where we're putting the hotel, this is where we're putting this. These are going to be 6,000 <br />square foot lots or whatever they are. I would -, I know that at the same time, you do need, <br />you will be looking for financiers for different parts of the projects and they are going to have <br />their own ideas. But as far as I see it, once, you know, not necessarily after it gets through us, <br />but by the time it gets -, if this is approved by the Council, that is the end of public testimony. <br />And then at that point, I know there is still, you still need to get, you still will be working with <br />the Planning Department, with Chris and whatever, but the public really, at that point, it seems <br />to me, does not have any more say in it. And I just feel somewhat uncomfortable. Maybe it's <br />just my general feeling is I am uncomfortable with such an open idea. I would like to see <br />things a bit more concrete just as to what is being planned. What that means as far as a <br />continuance and whether a month's continuance would help me, I'm not quite sure but -. <br />SPRINGER:Mr. Chair? <br />FUJIKAWA:Yes. <br />SPRINGER:May I ask -, just have a discussion with Commissioner McCall? <br />FUJIKAWA:Go ahead. <br />27 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.