2003-01-17 thilton - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

And I, they're not, since they've already been tagged by the Department of Public Works, I don't know that there's anything further that the Planning Department would do. If we found that they were being occupied now, that would be a separate violation, but there is a violation notice to them. As far as what was said about applying for a building permit and of a home, that sounds like something that would be allowed if they -, it would be allowed by the Planning Department. A single family home would the area. I'm not sure what they would have to do as far as the building permit side of it, but they probably could get a building permit to do that. GALDONES:Commissioners, any questions of any of the testifiers? If not, thank you very much. I would like to ask you to step back, plea Is there anybody else from the public wishing to testify on the subject matter? If none, could I have the Applicant's representative please come forward again. Thank you. You've heard the testimonies. Is there anything that you would like to add onto what you have already stated? COLTER:Not really. I will let Justin Hilton know that John Peard is satisfied with the idea that there will be a single family dwelling built there. And we're in the design phase, and as soon as we finish that and get an architect to review the plans, then he will be reviewing those. GALDONES:Okay. Thank you very much. COLTER:Thank you. GALDONES:Commissioners, there is an action taken by the Applicant to withdraw its application. What is the wishes of the Commissioners? GIFFIN:Mr. Chairman? GALDONES:Commissioner Giffin. GIFFIN:Mr. Chairman, I move that we accept the request to withdr Application SPP 02-033. KUBOTA:Second. GALDONES:Do I hear a second to that motion? KUBOTA:I second. 8