My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2021-11-09 Kailua Village Design Commission Minutes
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Kailua Village Design Commission
>
Minutes
>
2006-2024
>
2021
>
2021-11-09 Kailua Village Design Commission Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/12/2022 1:53:10 PM
Creation date
1/12/2022 1:53:00 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
5
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
new building and awning colors; bike racks; new propane tanks; raised courtyard on <br /> Pawai Place side; parking lot line adjustment on Kuakini Highway side; and reference <br /> to future signs. <br /> Applicant: Bill McCowatt <br /> Landowner: Lili`uokalani Trust Estate <br /> Lessee: Manini Holdings, LLC <br /> TMK: (3) 7-4-010:001, 002 and 018 <br /> Location: 74-5617, 74-5606, and 74-and 74-5599 Pawai Place, Kailua-Kona, HI <br /> 96740 <br /> Ms. Newlon gave a PowerPoint presentation on the proposed exterior improvements. She noted <br /> that although the application packet included their signage plan, the applicant did not submit a <br /> sign permit application, which would have to go through a different process before it could be <br /> referred to the Commission; therefore, that particular item is for the Commission's information <br /> only and not for action at this time. She showed a picture of the existing walkway that connects <br /> their parking lot and Kuakini Highway through the 50-foot-wide landscape easement along the <br /> highway, for which the applicant is requesting after-the-fact approval; she said that this concept <br /> had been proposed over ten years ago but received a negative recommendation then from both <br /> the Planning Department and the Department of Public Works ("DPW") due to concerns about <br /> safety, ADA compliance, and highway traffic. She noted that the current application did not <br /> provide any new information to address those concerns. She described the proposed murals and <br /> their locations one by one and commented that the applicant appeared to be leading towards <br /> making artistic work part of the renovation project. She presented the submittal of six proposed <br /> murals that were images of the actual artwork that was being proposed versus the conceptual <br /> mural work that had originally been submitted with the application. <br /> Commissioner Smith pointed to the list of 13 items on Page 7 of the applicant's submittal and <br /> asked for clarification on whether or not those were the specific items that the Commission was <br /> being asked to consider at this time. Ms. Newlon reviewed the 13 items with her presentation <br /> slides and said that aside from the proposed signs, which would require a separate application to <br /> both the Commission and DPW, those listed items were subject to the Commission's action at <br /> this time. She noted, however, that the materials submitted by the applicant appeared to be <br /> incomplete, for instance, no design information on the tiki torches, bike rack, or propane tank <br /> was included. <br /> Chairman Roth called upon the applicant for his presentation. Mr. Bill McCowatt clarified in <br /> response to Ms. Newton's earlier comment that the tiki torches would be the four-to five-foot- <br /> high standard type, and that their locations were shown on the site plan for Lot 14. He stated that <br /> the storefront as renovated would look identical to the existing storefront that had been approved <br /> by the Commission a year ago. He described the outdoor dining area over the site plans and <br /> asked for a retroactive approval of the staircase path; he said that the path had been used heavily <br /> for years even as a rocky climbing trail, and that the applicant had put in a safer set of stairs, <br /> which from a design standpoint the Commission should find attractive. Regarding the proposed <br /> murals, he clarified that the initial submittal had only shown the theme and sample work because <br /> the murals had still been in the development phase at that time; however, as shown in the current <br /> 2 <br /> Kailua Village Design Commission <br /> November 9,2021,Meeting Minutes <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.