My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2006-01-20 THELCO
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Leeward/Windward Planning Commission
>
Minutes & Exhibits Transcripts
>
2003-2022 Exhibits Transcripts
>
2006
>
2006-01-20 THELCO
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/13/2011 9:25:36 AM
Creation date
6/13/2011 9:25:34 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
14
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
SIRACUSA:Considerable amount of trunk height now at maturity that would then have <br />to be filled in some more if you want complete coverage. So, I was wondering if you had taken <br />that into consideration in your long range plan for the landscaping? <br />SICHTER:I believe it has been taken into consideration. And our landscaping, the <br />concept plan that was presented in EIS is very much an adaptable type of plan. So, as we move <br />along and see how the pattern of the landscaping works the applicant is certainly amenable to <br />enhancing that landscaping with additional material if warranted. <br />ALAMEDA:Thank you. Commissioners any other questions for our applicants? Go <br />ahead Commissioner Siracusa? <br />SIRACUSA:Well aalii is a good choice because its nice even though it also is conical <br />in shape but its lowest branch is still pretty low to the ground and it gives you some nice density <br />there. The naupaka of course is a full shrub that would give you lower density but not get as tall <br />as the aalii. And, the kokio keokeo, I would say is about the same as the naupaka in terms of <br />coverage. <br />ALAMEDA:Thank you. See you had free consultation you got there. You have any <br />questions for our-? Maybe you might have questions or any other comments given our <br />discussion? Fellow Commissioners any other questions? We do have one testifier but before I <br />ask you to sit down its a Mr. Joel Gimpel and if hes not here Im going to ask that you stay. <br />Mr. Gimpel? Giving that theres no further testimony it brings it back to our Commission. Any <br />other questions before I entertain a motion and move into discussion? Do you have any closing <br />statements or comments to make Mr. Sichter? <br />SICHTER:Id just like to acknowledge the Planning Departments Staff for the <br />efficiency of their work on this particular application. It was a very rapid turnaround and we <br />really, certainly do appreciate that, thank you. <br />ALAMEDA:Youre welcome. Go ahead Commissioner Graham. <br />GRAHAM:Sorry but I just want to say that in the spirit of your appreciation I just <br />wanttosaywegotthismaterialfromyoufolks(inaudible)Iamsureasyoucanseealotofwhat <br />you gave us is beyond what we really need to do a rezoning consideration but I did spend a lot of <br />timereadingitandfounditbothinterestingandinstructivesoitsnotwastedthankyou. <br />ALAMEDA:Other Commissioner comments? Go ahead Mr. Hayashi? <br />HAYASHI:I just wanted to state that Mr. Gimpel did leave his testimony with us and <br />its made a part of the record. <br />ALAMEDA:Okay. Mr. Gimpels testimony is in written form and is part of the <br />record. We are at the point of entertaining a motion. Commissioner Watanabe? <br />EXHIBIT G <br />11 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.