My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2006-01-20 THELCO
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Leeward/Windward Planning Commission
>
Minutes & Exhibits Transcripts
>
2003-2022 Exhibits Transcripts
>
2006
>
2006-01-20 THELCO
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/13/2011 9:25:36 AM
Creation date
6/13/2011 9:25:34 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
14
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
SIRACUSA:Thats very close for I know its alternative you know but its, its, still <br />looks very close to me for something as dangerous as Naphtha. <br />ALAMEDA:Questions? Any follow up question Commissioner Siracusa? <br />SIRACUSA:Well Im wondering you know like why they think considering Naphtha <br />as an alternative to diesel when theyre both basically petroleum based products and if we know <br />whats been happening you know with petroleum based products and prices and how-. Im <br />concerned about how that would effect the electric bills for everybody and why Im wondering <br />arent you looking at something to burn that would come from a different source that wouldnt <br />be tied in to say mid-east oil or OPEC or that sort of thing. <br />LEE:Very good question. The reason that we listed Naphtha as an alternative. <br />Thereisadifference,theconstituentsofwhatconsistsofNaphthaanddiesel.And,itjustis <br />based on perhaps theres going to be future more stringent regulatory air permit regulations from <br />the Environmental Protection Agency or from the Department of Health. And the reason that we <br />would choose Naphtha is that Naphtha has a lower level of nitrogen-. <br />SIRACUSA:Flash point. <br />LEE:-in the Naphtha than the diesel. So the emission that comes out as a result <br />of combusting this fuel is what we call NOx, Nitrogen Oxides. So by switching to Naphtha you <br />would have a lower level of Nitrogen Oxides being emitted. So this would be, we would move <br />to that alternative if the permit restrictions become much, much more stringent. <br />SICHTER:Id like to add to Mr. Lees comments that of the remaining construction <br />to be done at the plant it can be summarized as the installation of a heat recovery system. And <br />that heat recovery system is referred to in the application as a ST7 or steam turbine 7. It would <br />consist of a mechanism whereby the heat from the existing combustion turbines 5 and 6 is <br />captured in order to make the facility more fuel-efficient. So that is the, improves the <br />environmental function of the entire facility by capturing wasted heat and using it to generate <br />additional megawatts of electricity. So the remaining construction that is intended is intended to <br />improve the efficiency of the plant. <br />ALAMEDA:Commissioner Siracusa follow up question for that? <br />SIRACUSA:Not at the moment. <br />ALAMEDA:Okay, other Commissioners any questions for our applicants? <br />Commissioner Springer? <br />SPRINGER:Thanks. Im just looking at the Landscape Concept Plan and in that our <br />condition has been amended to maintain rather than provide could you just walk through me on <br />the photograph of where? You have a good plant list but I cant quite make out the fuzzy print <br />on my copy where the actual plantings are occurring. <br />EXHIBIT G <br />8 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.