My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2006-01-20 TEvans Family Trust
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Leeward/Windward Planning Commission
>
Minutes & Exhibits Transcripts
>
2003-2022 Exhibits Transcripts
>
2006
>
2006-01-20 TEvans Family Trust
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/13/2011 9:25:47 AM
Creation date
6/13/2011 9:25:44 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
8
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
ALAMEDA:All right did you get a chance to look at the Departments response to the <br />application and the conditions? <br />CONVENTZ:Yes sir and I replied to the single agencies and not to the Department, I got <br />that last week yeah. <br />ALAMEDA:Okay you have any concerns or comments regarding the or? <br />CONVENTZ:No he did a fine job I have nothing to add at this time. <br />ALAMEDA:Okay. Commissioners you have any questions for our applicants <br />representative? Commissioner Graham? <br />GRAHAM:Inoticeontheapplicationyouindicatedthatyouwerewillingtohookup <br />all the existing dwellings to the sewer line. But I believe the Planning Director only indicated <br />that the new dwelling would be hooked to the sewer line. In the interest of our shoreline <br />protection ideas is it okay with you if we put a condition on our SMA permit that-. <br />CONVENTZ:Absolutely. <br />GRAHAM:-confirms with what you said about hooking up existing dwellings as <br />well? <br />CONVENTZ:Absolutely. <br />GRAHAM:Thank you. <br />ALAMEDA:Thank you Commissioner Graham. Other Commissioners? <br />Commissioner Siracusa? <br />SIRACUSA:Yes youve seen the 2 request for standing in contested case? <br />CONVENTZ:Yes I get one yesterday night and one early this week. <br />SIRACUSA:Do you have any comments or objections to either ofthose that youd like <br />to state at this time? <br />CONVENTZ:Only that those are adjoining neighbors who certainly have the right to-, <br />they are different from the general public and so they certainly have the right basically to, for a <br />contested case hearing. I dont know the reasons. I have no idea. <br />SIRACUSA:Thank you so as far as you can see they do have the right to standing? <br />CONVENTZ:Because of the property ownership. <br />EXHIBIT E <br />3 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.