Laserfiche WebLink
environment, it€s only under those kinds of conditions that traffic becomes relevant to an SMA <br />permit. And then, if it is relevant, then the Commission also has to look at whether there are <br />conditions that can be applied to mitigate that impact, rather than just rejecting the permit out of <br />hand. <br />So, basically, traffic should not be an issue on an SMA permit unless it is a real impact on the <br />environment; and then you need to see if you can mitigate that impact by conditions. <br />SIRACUSA:And increased density, as an issue? <br />TORIGOE:I would defer that. <br />SPRINGER:Mr. Takemoto. <br />TAKEMOTO:Well,notnecessarilydensity,you€rereferringtoaffordablehousing, <br />right? And, there is a finding in the hearings officer€s report, it€s Number 54. That basically, if I <br />can summarize, that this property was already zoned and affordable housing requirements are <br />imposed at the rezoning stage. And so, basically, through an SMA it€s not appropriate to impose <br />affordable housing requirements. The way, I don€t know if you can rough topic, but the way <br />Finding 54 is written now, the Director had some problems with it and he wanted it clarified. Is <br />it appropriate now for me to read the Director€s desired amendment to this finding? <br />TORIGOE:I suppose. <br />SPRINGER:Mr. Torigoe? <br />TORIGOE:Yeah, go ahead. <br />TAKEMOTO:Okay, so it would, presently reads, Although Messick claims that units <br />within the development will not be affordable for the local market,‚ and here€s where the change <br />begins, we would strike everything after that comma and replace it with, the zoning of the <br />subject property preceded affordable housing requirements. Hence there are no affordable <br />housing requirements on this project.‚ And, The SMA law does not authorize adding a new <br />affordable housing condition to property already zoned and without this requirement.‚ <br />SIRACUSA:So you€re saying it€s grandfathered? <br />TAKEMOTO:Yes. <br />SPRINGER:And that€s an amendment, recommended amendment to what section? <br />TAKEMOTO:Finding 54. <br />SPRINGER:Thank you. Other Commissioners, any discussion? If the Commissioners <br />have no further questions for the applicant and his representative, I would like to, again, ask if <br />there€s anyone in the audience who would like to testify. <br /> <br />