2022-01-07 EMC special meeting draft minutes

Home

KEKAI: Usually when we go to court raising state statutes. ADAMS: Anything else from the commissioners? Seeing none, I ask Malia Kekai whether you have other witnesses? KEKAI: Yes. Thank you. We would now like to call Inspector Antoinette Nakatani. ADAMS: I need to swear you in. Do you solemnly swear or affirm that the testimony you're about to provide is the truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth? NAKATANI: I do. ADAMS: And is Exhibit D your written testimony? NAKATANI: Yes. KEKAI: Sorry, Chair. Just one clarification for the record. I realized that the second half of her answer for No. 11, the written testimony was cut off, so I just would like to add it here. So it should actually state: “Yes. Looking at the connection card on file at DEM Wastewater Division, the determination of two units is correct,” but that got cut out. So I just wanted to add that for the record. Again, it should read “Yes, looking at the connection card on file at DEM Wastewater Division, the determination of two units is correct.” WONG: Okay. Can you email myself and the parties and Peter a copy of that to complete the record to properly show Exhibit D, and then you can have Ms. Nakatani testify further to what you stated. ADAMS: Do Appellants have any cross examination of this witness? WONG: I'm sorry, Chair. Did we swear in Ms. Nakatani? ADAMS: Yes, I did. WONG: Okay. And does Ms. Nakatani have anything in addition to her written testimony to offer? ADAMS: Well, maybe that's the way to read in what you should have had written and answered to No. 11, in your testimony. NAKATANI: Are you asking me a question? ADAMS: Yeah, I think. Why don't you just read the full answer to No. 11 in your written testimony? That way it will be on the record. 17