My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2005-01-21 TLAURANCE
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Leeward/Windward Planning Commission
>
Minutes & Exhibits Transcripts
>
2003-2022 Exhibits Transcripts
>
2005
>
2005-01-21 TLAURANCE
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/13/2011 9:43:09 AM
Creation date
6/13/2011 9:43:03 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
36
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
SPRINGER:Thank you. I would turn to Mr. Torigoe then. The request was not to <br />discuss definitions but our responsibilities and our limitations and vulnerabilities under the rule. <br />Do we just proceed at this time now? <br />TORIGOE:Well, its up- its up to the Commission. I feel a little bit reluctant to <br />discuss openly on the record certain things which will pertain to my representation of you should <br />this go to a circuit court appeal. Because, for instance, what I say here and now about the <br />definition of these rules is going to be quoted back at me in whatever position I take at circuit <br />court, unless it is done in executive session. Thats why we normally go into executive session <br />when you want to discuss, you know, the legal position that I would be taking on these rules. <br />SIRACUSA:Arent these definitions written down somewhere already? <br />TORIGOE:Well, as you can see there are attorneys who will try to draw different <br />inferencesanddifferentmeaningsoutofthewordsthatarewrittenhere.Andsowhat-itsounds <br />like what some of you would like to ask me is really from my independent standpoint as a non- <br />party and advising you what I think, you know, the appropriate meanings and applications should <br />be that are drawn out of these words. And whatever I say on that, on the record here, would be <br />used in circuit court, unless it is done in executive session. Also, well, I guess what you would <br />be doing then is saying that this-my communications with you on this matter would not be <br />privileged under the attorney/client privilege. And so there would be- it would be very difficult <br />thereafter to have discussions with me about these definitions without those discussions being <br />discovered and also used in court. <br />SIRACUSA:I see. In that case, would it be appropriate for me to change my vote, or <br />would we have to make a motion to start all over again? <br />TORIGOE:I think, yeah, you should- you could make a motion to reconsider since <br />you were the person who voted against it. <br />SIRACUSA:I would like to make a motion to reconsider. <br />SPRINGER:Thank you, Commissioner Siracusa. Is there a second? <br />MCCALL:Second. <br />SPRINGER:Thank you, Commissioner McCall. Moved by Commissioner Siracusa, <br />seconded by Commissioner McCall, to reconsider. Is there any discussion? <br />Mr. Graham. <br />GRAHAM:Id just like to say- I am supportive of Commissioner Siracusas <br />reluctance to go into executive session. So, the particular things that Ive heard brought up are <br />the use of the word land and the use of hardship; and I would just like to say that, you know, <br />my intention in going along with having executive sessions that we restrict our deliberations to <br />just these two specific and any other specific legal issue that Mr. Torigoe or the Commission <br />17 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.