Laserfiche WebLink
available to build on. Therefore, and Mr. Laurance will explain to you what he was trying to <br />accomplish in building his house but the argument that he could have made it smaller or he could <br />have moved it is a little bit different when the area left to him to build is reduced by public <br />access use. So we think that is a unique circumstance. And that is one of the unique <br />circumstances. <br />Another is, you know, the shoreline. When he acquired, the property the shoreline was located <br />20 feet makai of the rock wall. The shoreline has been recertified. You all have heard a lot <br />about the changing nature of the regulatory process, changing nature of definitions of shorelines. <br />Those, were not here to debate those issues because the shoreline is now certified at the rock <br />wall. At the time Mr. Laurance acquired the property, the shoreline appeared to be 20 feet makai <br />of the wall. That presents a somewhat unique situation. <br />Then the other criteria, is the request the best practical alternative which conforms to the purpose <br />oftherule.SoifMr.Lauranceisgoingtohaveapooltheonlypracticalalternativeavailableat <br />this point is the approval of the variance. Now I understand thats a little circular but what were <br />talking about is what is the definition of the criteria set out in the rule. And thats the definition. <br />Its, it also goes on to say that before granting a hardship variance the Planning Commission <br />must determine that the request is a reasonable use of land. The determination of reasonableness <br />of the use of land shall consider the factors such as shoreline conditions, erosion, surf and flood <br />conditions, and the geography of the lot as it relates to health and safety. Okay. These are the <br />criteria to use to determine if its a reasonable use of land. We have offered evidence on each of <br />these criteria. The shoreline conditions, you observed them. There is shoreline public access <br />and use a portion of the property makai of the wall. The pool will in no way interfere with, the <br />pool is located entirely mauka of the wall. The pool will in no way interfere with shoreline <br />conditions. Weve offered testimony, it will not cause erosion. Again, it is located mauka of the <br />wall. The surf and flood conditions, the pool is located above the base flood elevation. The base <br />flood elevation for the lot is 11 feet. As you saw when you were at the property the, the, it is <br />slab on grade. This is not an elevated structure. The structure is not built up on stilts. Im not <br />sure what Mr. Rothstein was talking about when he said in his testimony that the house was built <br />up on stilts. But, as you were there, when we were standing where the pool was going to be, we <br />were on a concrete slab. That slab was the level of the house and, and so, this is not, theres not <br />a flood issue involved here. It complies, the building complies with County flood requirements. <br />The geography of the lot as it relates to health and safety, you know, again, this is a public access <br />lot. The public access nearly surrounds the pool. If there are health and safety implications to <br />the pool there are certainly health and safety implications of the public access, and frankly there, <br />there arent. I mean, there, there are no, whether theres a pool there, or grass, or a deck has no <br />impact on public health and safety. Dr. Richard Brock, well, weve offered evidence that this is <br />going to be a salt water purified pool. Dr. Richard Brock has offered testimony that there will no <br />adverse impact on coastal processes or on coastal biology. So, you know, in terms of what <br />criteria are available, what criteria the Department is to use to assess a variance, the application <br />meets the criteria. <br />Theres a lot of, the reason the Planning Commission oh, sorry, the Planning Department made <br />an adverse recommendation is, according to their statement, because they didnt demonstrate <br />6 <br /> <br />