|
VITOUSEK: And that makes sense that we can't commit to anything that's beyond the existing
<br /> zoning, but, you know,just for the sake of memorializing it in ordinance, establishing that the
<br /> minimum of 142 units is the condition of the overall rezoning, with the understanding that the
<br /> phases of construction of the workforce housing will follow the phases of construction of the
<br /> Kumu Hou project.
<br /> FUKE: So, so if that's the case, then if I can askTracie, can you put up the wording again?
<br /> CAMERO: Yes, sorry, let me get that up there.
<br /> FUKE: On the workforce housing condition, proposed condition.
<br /> CAMERO: Here you go.
<br /> FUKE: So, if I hear you correctly, what you are suggesting is, generally, is that like in the first
<br /> line, "As represented by the Applicant, the Applicant shall cause the development of the
<br /> workforce housing project," maybe to say, "cause the development of a minimum 142-workforce
<br /> housing project." Is that what you are saying?
<br /> VITOUSEK: Yeah, "cause the development of a minimum 142-unit workforce housing project."
<br /> FUKE: Okay, so I think, like I'm listening—good thing I did two years but I'm listening to
<br /> Ann over here like planning consultant, and she mentioned that if we are going to do a 142-unit
<br /> project, at least one unit has to be set aside for the management, so it would be best if you want
<br /> to identify a number, "shall cause the development of a minimum of 140-workforce housing
<br /> project."
<br /> VITOUSEK: Sounds good to me. And, and with the idea being that, you know, of course,
<br /> proceed with doing everything you can to increase the density and provide more workforce
<br /> housing, but we don't want you to do less workforce housing. So
<br /> PLUNKETT: We are comfortable with the minimum.
<br /> VITOUSEK: Okay.
<br /> FUKE: So, Mr. Plunkett, the applicant, is saying he is comfortable with a minimum of 140, the
<br /> insertion of, "cause the development of a minimum of 140-workforce housing."
<br /> VITOUSEK: Okay. Commissioner Paishon-Duarte, I see you've got your hand up.
<br /> PAISHON-DUARTE: Yes, thank you. Pardon me if, that II know the answer to this, but I'm
<br /> just going to ask. So please help me understand, once you, say, you are successful and receiving
<br /> your application is successful today, and you go through construction, who is the final owner,
<br /> who is the final owner of the workforce development? Is that going to be, is that, who is that
<br /> conveyed to? So I'm hearing land, the land title will be conveyed and, but who is going to own
<br /> 13
<br /> EXHIBIT D
<br />
|