2021-12-16 Leeward Exh D (Items 1 thru 6)

Home

VITOUSEK: Okay, again, I don't see that as you know, I hear you and I understand you but I don't see that as satisfying the need to construct this, given the fact that there is no timetable on that one, and there is no, the condition for Mauna Lani is probably similar where there is no timetable. So, to me, frankly, it's just, you know, this condition as it is has been floating for so long that we need to tie it down and we need to get it completed. FUKE: So, are you- - - VITOUSEK: - -VITOUSEK: What's that? FUKE: So do you have specific timetable - - -when the road should be completed? VITOUSEK: I think, I think it would be appropriate to tie that timetable to the construction of either or any of the Kumu Hou, same with the affordable housing where that connection should be completed prior to certificate of occupancy for the first phases of Kumu Hou. FUKE: So, will you add like one more sentence to then like, "but in any event no later than completion of a road on the adjacent property to the north or occupancy permit for any unit within the Kumu Hou project, whichever occurs first?" VITOUSEK: Yeah, I'd be okay with that. FUKE: Okay, that's fine. PLUNKETT: - - -tied to the Project District? FUKE: Yeah. PLUNKETT: He wants the same language in there. FUKE: Yeah. VITOUSEK: Yeah, it would be, it'll be tied to the Project District as well, yep. FUKE: Right, yeah, so this one would apply to, again, the new condition to the Project District and in this—well, that will be a new condition for both rezoning applications, so that's acceptable, Mr. Chair. VITOUSEK: Okay, thank you. Does anybody have anything further on the—and then as we are going,just a housekeeping thing, who is keeping track of the amendments that we are making to these conditions from the County side? JACKSON: Chair, I'm attempting to keep track of them. 18 EXHIBIT D