Laserfiche WebLink
VITOUSEK: Okay. Yeah, that makes sense to me, so the initial five-year administrative time <br /> extension, and then after that, if there is a need for an additional time extension, then the <br /> Commission would have to review the change in the project based on the conditions that exist at <br /> that time <br /> FUKE: - - - <br /> VITOUSEK: <br /> - -VITOUSEK: meaning that it could be re-conditioned, could be rescinded, whatever that may <br /> be at that time. <br /> PLUNKETT: Yeah, we understand it's not a rubber stamp, so we understand. <br /> VITOUSEK: Okay. Okay, so I think we can, we can work with County staff to get that <br /> language included as condition. <br /> KAY: And just to be clear, these are conditions of the SMA permits. Is that correct? Or just the <br /> SMA permit for Area B? <br /> FUKE: SMA permit for Area B. <br /> PLUNKETT: Area B only, that's important. <br /> VITOUSEK: Yeah, Area B, because as I understand, that the existing Area A is already covered <br /> under the existing SMA, but they are relocating the location. Is that right? <br /> PLUNKETT: Yes, correct. We are just shifting,we are really just taking their units and shifting <br /> across the fairway, that's, that's all we are doing to make the plan work. <br /> VITOUSEK: Okay. Commissioners, are there any other questionsso, and as a practical <br /> matter, well, I guess I'll let it play out—any other questions? If not, can we seek a motion? <br /> Commissioner DeFranco. <br /> DEFRANCO: I think I attempted this before. So I will need help, because we have a lot of—so <br /> are we going to do all six of these motions at the same time or are we doing each one with <br /> specific additions that we've added to them? So let's say,just an idea, so the first one, I move <br /> that the application for amendment to Special Management Area Permit number 25 be approved <br /> based on the planning director's recommendations, which shall be adopted, and in addition, with <br /> what motions we, I mean, we've agreed upon here between us—is there something added to that <br /> one, that specific one? <br /> VITOUSEK: It's a great question. So procedurally, how, how do we take this on? We don't <br /> want to close out AMEND SMA 25 until the other ones are issued—was that what I remember <br /> from last time? <br /> KERN: Yes, that's correct. We want to <br /> 24 <br /> EXHIBIT D <br />