My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2005-01-21 TSUFFOLKOPUAA
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Leeward/Windward Planning Commission
>
Minutes & Exhibits Transcripts
>
2003-2022 Exhibits Transcripts
>
2005
>
2005-01-21 TSUFFOLKOPUAA
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/13/2011 9:43:44 AM
Creation date
6/13/2011 9:43:29 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
59
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
SPRINGER:Commissioners? I have a couple of questions. Will the affordable <br />units be concentrated or willthey be dispersed throughout the project? <br />FUKE:Well, Mr. Cook can talk about Puaa. But asfar as like the Suffolk <br />project, its, that would have to be determined ultimately by, I guess, bothprojects will <br />ultimately have to be determined bythe County Housing Agency, which is the, which <br />consists of the members of the County Council. So they could then stipulate whether its <br />like spread out, you know,within the project area, or concentrated, or however. <br />SPRINGER:Thank you. I have another question regarding the Department of <br />Transportation correspondence thats dated January 21, 2004. In the first section, thefirst <br />paragraph, it says that there are assumptions regarding certain improvements that will be <br />provided by the adjacent Pualani Estates. Can you discuss that with us? <br />FUKE:They were referring to the signalization at that main intersection, <br />soweknowthatthatsafactthatitsgoingtogoin. <br />COOK:Italkedtothedevelopersandtheysaidthattheyhavethe,the <br />plans are being processed for the street lights for the, three-sided street lights, and they <br />anticipate it will probably be about a year. Theyre obligated to install them before that <br />road opens up to Hualalai, but theyre saying within a year to year-and-a-half. <br />SPRINGER:Thank you. <br />FUKE:So in answer to, you know, your question about Department of <br />Transportations comments, we received a copy this morning. And we noticed that as we <br />went through all of them then they have been addressed, I think, very well by the <br />Planning Directors recommended condition. <br />And, in that regard, like I had also passed out, you know, if there are no further questions, <br />you know, by the Commissioners or you, Madam Chair, I did pass out earlier like <br />proposed amendments to both the Puaa Development as well as the Suffolk <br />Development. And these, do you want me to go through them right now? <br />GRAHAM:Maybe we should take some public testimony pretty soon, huh? <br />FUKE:Oh, okay, sure. <br />SPRINGER:Yes. Im wondering and, Mr. Torigoe, the amendments that have <br />been circulated are not, theyre not the same for both. Im wondering at what time we <br />separate this discussion. Weve had a good introductory discussion on the areas of <br />commonality. Im wondering when we should separate out discussion of, first, Suffolk <br />and then Puaa. The amendments are not the same for both. Per Commissioner Grahams <br />comments, we should be accepting testimony on the two or if the testifier should separate <br />out their comments for one and the other? <br />16 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.