Laserfiche WebLink
SPRINGER:Commissioners? I have a couple of questions. Will the affordable <br />units be concentrated or willthey be dispersed throughout the project? <br />FUKE:Well, Mr. Cook can talk about Puaa. But asfar as like the Suffolk <br />project, it€s, that would have to be determined ultimately by, I guess, bothprojects will <br />ultimately have to be determined bythe County Housing Agency, which is the, which <br />consists of the members of the County Council. So they could then stipulate whether it€s <br />like spread out, you know,within the project area, or concentrated, or however. <br />SPRINGER:Thank you. I have another question regarding the Department of <br />Transportation correspondence that€s dated January 21, 2004. In the first section, thefirst <br />paragraph, it says that there are assumptions regarding certain improvements that will be <br />provided by the adjacent Pualani Estates. Can you discuss that with us? <br />FUKE:They were referring to the signalization at that main intersection, <br />soweknowthatthat€safactthatit€sgoingtogoin. <br />COOK:Italkedtothedevelopersandtheysaidthattheyhavethe,the <br />plans are being processed for the street lights for the, three-sided street lights, and they <br />anticipate it will probably be about a year. They€re obligated to install them before that <br />road opens up to Hualalai, but they€re saying within a year to year-and-a-half. <br />SPRINGER:Thank you. <br />FUKE:So in answer to, you know, your question about Department of <br />Transportation€s comments, we received a copy this morning. And we noticed that as we <br />went through all of them then they have been addressed, I think, very well by the <br />Planning Director€s recommended condition. <br />And, in that regard, like I had also passed out, you know, if there are no further questions, <br />you know, by the Commissioners or you, Madam Chair, I did pass out earlier like <br />proposed amendments to both the Puaa Development as well as the Suffolk <br />Development. And these, do you want me to go through them right now? <br />GRAHAM:Maybe we should take some public testimony pretty soon, huh? <br />FUKE:Oh, okay, sure. <br />SPRINGER:Yes. I€m wondering and, Mr. Torigoe, the amendments that have <br />been circulated are not, they€re not the same for both. I€m wondering at what time we <br />separate this discussion. We€ve had a good introductory discussion on the areas of <br />commonality. I€m wondering when we should separate out discussion of, first, Suffolk <br />and then Puaa. The amendments are not the same for both. Per Commissioner Graham€s <br />comments, we should be accepting testimony on the two or if the testifier should separate <br />out their comments for one and the other? <br />16 <br /> <br />