2005-01-21 TSUFFOLKOPUAA - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

SPRINGER:Thank you, Mr. Fuke. Mr. Takemoto, any comments? TAKEMOTO:Let me kind of defer to Public Works. Ki, you got any concerns about this amendment? EMLER:Yeah, unfortunately, I didnt get this recommendation until yesterday late so I wasnt really, I didnt really go over the conditions on the drainage issues very well. I thought our conditions in our Recommendation were pretty well down. But I dont have any objection to the Applicants proposed changes to the conditions. I think theyre well done. Chapter 27 regulates that anyway; and, so, any work in the flood plain falls under Chapter 27. SPRINGER:Thank you, Mr. Emler. Commissioners, any questions of Mr. Emler while hes up. Thanks again. And, then, finally -? FUKE:Sure. And, finally, the last amendment is amendment to ConditionO,whichrelates,again,totheprohibitionofanytypeofimprovementswithin the Zone AE or shaded Zone X, like I had discussed earlier on the Suffolk application. SPRINGER:Commissioners, any questions on these proposed amendments? Any other further discussion with the Applicants representatives before we begin public testimony? DARROW:If I could just ask the Deputy Director a quick comment? Condition O and Condition L of Puaa and Suffolk, would it be more appropriate to say Zone X-500 versus shaded Zone X? TAKEMOTO:Do you know if shaded Zone X is a term of art? It would be clearer if it said X-500, or 500-year flood plain, or something like that. DARROW:So X-500? TAKEMOTO:Yeah, or then put in parenthesis something like 500-year flood zone? SPRINGER:Mr. Fuke, is that acceptable? FUKE:Sure, thats the intent. SPRINGER:Thank you. If the Applicants representatives could stand back now. We have on our testimony sign-up sheet, Joel Gimpel, Harold Murata, Josephine Keliipio, Ann Peterson and Janice Palma-Glennie. I dont see Ms. Palma-Glennie in the audience but -. PETERSON:She left written testimony. 22