My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2005-01-21 TSUFFOLKOPUAA
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Leeward/Windward Planning Commission
>
Minutes & Exhibits Transcripts
>
2003-2022 Exhibits Transcripts
>
2005
>
2005-01-21 TSUFFOLKOPUAA
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/13/2011 9:43:44 AM
Creation date
6/13/2011 9:43:29 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
59
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
But over here I have the parcel just below it thats darkened. And, so, and then the other <br />one on the Puaa is, includes this one and the parcel to the right of it. So, Im not sure <br />what were talking about when were talking about Suffolk as opposed to what were <br />talking about when were talking about Puaa. Id like some clarification and guidance on <br />this, please. <br />DARROW:Sure, Commissioner Siracusa. The colored renderings that you <br />have was submitted to you this morning; and, again, thatll be addressed more <br />specifically by the Applicants representative. The area that youre looking at on that <br />map is a portion of Puaa. That, right there, is the Suffolk property which is identified <br />here. So they are, to say the least, theyre strangely configured lots. But this area here is <br />the Puaa property just above the Suffolk property, so this is the relation of both. <br />SIRACUSA:Yeah. So we have a breakdown of how that Puaa section looks, <br />butwedonthaveabreakdown,really,whatthiscolorrenderinghere,fortheothertwo <br />areas. Makes it hard to envision the totality if were supposed to look at this as a unity <br />and, you know, in some respects. <br />DARROW:Yeah. If I could defer that to the Applicants representative, hell <br />address those issues with his presentation. Thank you. <br />SPRINGER:Any other questions for staff at this time? Commissioner Graham, <br />you have anything? <br />GRAHAM:No. <br />SPRINGER:Okay. Mr. Fuke, did you receive the Planning Departments <br />Background Report and Recommendation? <br />FUKE:Yes, and a copy was provided to both of the Applicants; and both <br />have indicated that they had no objections to the proposed conditions. I would like to <br />note, however, at some point in time, you know, I did pass out some proposed <br />amendments; and these amendments are designed exclusively not to affect any of the <br />substance of the conditions as proposed by the Director but deal more with clarity and <br />just tightening up certain language. <br />With that, Madam Chair, Id like to also acknowledge the, you know, the presence of <br />Mr. Brian Cook, whos head of Puaa Development. Hes over here. With him is also his <br />Planner-Architect, Michael Riehm, who did the design; and Ill go into that and <br />Mr. Riehm will also go into a little bit more detail on the design. Mr. Dru McCrue, Dru <br />McCabe, rather, hes from Colorado and he was not able to make it here, but he did give <br />assurance that the conditions were acceptable. <br />Before going on the presentation, however, Id like to just touch very briefly upon like, I <br />guess, the question that Commissioner Graham had raised in terms of the Land Use <br />Commission. We do concur with what Mr. Takemoto had indicated. You know, first of <br />6 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.