My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2005-01-21 THOLMES0114
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Leeward/Windward Planning Commission
>
Minutes & Exhibits Transcripts
>
2003-2022 Exhibits Transcripts
>
2005
>
2005-01-21 THOLMES0114
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/13/2011 9:44:46 AM
Creation date
6/13/2011 9:44:42 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
16
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
your sewage is out of there, so we have no real problem. On, the other alternatives are if <br />you have like a cesspool, obviously, whatever you got going down is going to work its <br />way one way or the other to the ocean, so thats not good. In between the sewer system <br />and the cesspool, Mr. Immings situation, which is a later item today where he has a 14- <br />unit condo project, there you do an individual wastewater treatment system, which is <br />certainly more costly than a septic system. <br />When I talked to Department of Health people and I tried to get rough figures from them <br />on what kind of clean-up you get from these different kinds of systems, basically from <br />talking to Hilo personnel, rough rule of thumb like an individual treatment system with <br />its dispersal field and all will give roughly a 90% cleanup of the nutrients and all. And <br />that they tell me that a septic tank system gives roughly a 60 to 80% cleanup, and that <br />varies on a number of things. One thing that they say is the key thing that varies on is <br />the- sort of the leach field, whats the quality of leach field. If you have a really good <br />deepdirtleachfieldyouregoingtogetthebestendofthatcleanup.Ifyoudonthavea <br />good dirt leach field youre going to be more towards the lower end. And here, you <br />know, as we heard from Ms. Kjos and all, where she talks about, you know, water <br />coming down this rock so its just going to run along, I have to feel like its probably not <br />a particularly good location for a leach field. <br />I also asked about Puako, you know, what goes on in Puako since theyve built all these <br />new houses. I know Puako used to have cesspools. And what I was told by Department <br />of Health, and Mr. Mooers may well know Puako better than me, I was told that the <br />newer houses down at Puako even though theyre single family residences are being <br />required to put in individual wastewater treatment systems because of the sensitivity to <br />the reef which is so close there. So to me, sort of summarizing, the fact that Mr. Mooers <br />brought last time to the meeting when I wasnt here word from the Bishop Estate that it <br />was not feasible to connect to the- to the sewer system, thats very understandable; and <br />that alternative appears to be off the table in any reasonable way. But, again, Im looking <br />to a precedent and what are we going to do in this stretch. Are we going to allow septic <br />systems and allow expansion of use in this area where the Department of Health will <br />approve a septic system that its okay with us, bearing in mind that Department of <br />Healths primary responsibility is human health not nutrient flow to the ocean? So we <br />dont find the Department of Health coming and testifying about what the quality of a <br />near shore marine environment will be based on these systems. <br />So, Im still stuck in a little quandary where Im reluctant to say a septic system is okay <br />because I know theres going to be more leaching than a individual wastewater treatment <br />system. And, Im sure that if the applicant was putting up a 14-unit condo where he <br />could afford it, you know, he would probably go to an individual treatment system, and <br />its probably very difficult for him to afford it in this particular situation. But there is <br />some negative impacts towards the ocean from this and any other developments that may <br />come along in this 3/4-mile stretch in the future, so thats what my concern is. And I just <br />wanted to make that apparent to Mr. Mooers and also to the other Commissioners that its <br />a precedent issue as well as the specifics of this issue being so close to Kahaluu. Thank <br />you. <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.