Laserfiche WebLink
AU: Okay well Ms. Rohr can you raise up your right hand. Do you swear or affirm to tell the <br /> truth before the Windward Planning Commission? Okay, I see your hand. Thank you, Ms. <br /> Rohr, thank you very much. I do see your hand, so you are sworn in, so please clearly state your <br /> name and the town that you live in prior to your testimony. Please limit your testimony to three <br /> minutes and try not to be repetitive we'll let you know at two and a half minutes. So, you can go <br /> ahead. Thank you, Ms. Rohr. You can start when you're ready. <br /> ROHR: Why was I holding up my right hand, I'm hard of hearing, I have to hold my ears close <br /> to my iPad. I was holding up my right hand was it because I was swearing to tell the truth? <br /> AU: Yes, Ms. Rohr. <br /> ROHR: Okay. I swear to tell the truth. My name is Claudia Rohr, I'm testifying today about <br /> the SMA report of the Planning Director. Specifically, I would like to point out the long delays <br /> in the SMA, SAA for Gault's Gulch and Hui Hooleimaluo. I am next door neighbor to Hui <br /> Hooleimaluo and they're currently holding outdoor educational classes on a residential zoned <br /> property. They have submitted an application, which I just got access yesterday to the updated <br /> application and it says that they're going to be building up to 10,000 square foot of buildings. <br /> Estimated value of 1.4 million to service 200 people and this is a residential area across from the <br /> beach parks. They're saying that there's 40% water on the property and although they don't use <br /> the word aquaculture, they've used the word that their objective is to restore the fishponds and to <br /> produce food of which it's problematic because it's actually not an allowed permitted use. So, <br /> this is a complicated project and before they invest any more money, I think that the Planning <br /> Department has plenty of information to direct them to apply for a Use permit and for an SMA <br /> Major permit and let's get on with this so I can do a contested case. Why waste their money, <br /> they've chose the wrong zoning for their project. <br /> Number two, the Gault's Gulch project. Alex Roy has withheld information for me that I written <br /> to obtain access to regarding this SAA. He has wrong information and is misdirecting the <br /> applicant's consultant and has directed them to create parking for two cars. This is in <br /> contravention of a zoning ordinance that directed that there will be parking, a convenient drive- <br /> up access for parking for four(4) cars that's zoning Ordinance 05 50. I was in hearings for a <br /> year and a half, this was supposed to settle a dispute about public access, and it was supposed to <br /> be a convenient drive-up access. The Planning Department is allowed Gault's Gulch is actually <br /> Jere Henderson which is Continental Pacific. They have allowed them to fence off the parking, <br /> the drive-up parking that had already been relocated by Bobby Jean Leithead-Todd and was far <br /> from the cliff edge. Now they're allowing them through this process of an SAA to try to resolve <br /> the violation of fencing off public access which is a misdemeanor I believe. Anyway, it should <br /> be a misdemeanor this should be a criminal offense fencing out public access like that for more <br /> than two years. <br /> Now everybody is so confused about the history, now the only one who knows most of it is Jeff, <br /> but he didn't attend all of the County Council hearings where this ordinance was finalized. I <br /> keep trying to remind people that the spirit of that ordnance addition of that parking was to <br /> resolve a conflict with the community that had gone on for more than a year, and if they hadn't <br /> agreed to that it was actually suggested by Maukaloa Farms and Jere Henderson and Hank <br /> 2 <br /> EXHIBIT A <br />