Laserfiche WebLink
DARROW: I understand your question. Given the unique circumstances of this particular <br /> application and the location of this particular property almost being separated from the Village <br /> Core and connected to as the applicant represented it noted a more rural designated area. I think <br /> given the unique circumstances, I think the adjustment is and as well agreed to by DPW that it is <br /> acceptable. Ultimately, it'll be the Council's decision whether or not they feel this is <br /> appropriate, but I think we've all agreed that moving forward in this particular where we're at <br /> now with this proposal. It's acceptable, but I just again wanted to bring to light that we've seen <br /> it in the past, things change. We've had people come back in and do those traffic analysis <br /> reports and requirements being placed on them that were more significant. That required the <br /> curb, gutters, sidewalk construction with the increase in uses. So, the reason why I'm saying it is <br /> because we have it as a condition. Right now, that they can do these improvements, but in the <br /> future, they may be required to do other types of improvements. Just wanted to bring that up so <br /> everyone's clear on it, thank you. <br /> GALIMBA: Thank you. <br /> AU: Thank you Commissioner Galimba for the question. If we have no more discussion, we <br /> can call for the vote. <br /> KAY: Yes, thank you, Mr. Chair. So, this is a motion for a favorable recommendation with <br /> amendments to Condition K. Commissioner Lin? <br /> LIN: Aye. <br /> KAY: Commissioner Clarkson? <br /> CLARKSON: Aye. <br /> KAY: Commissioner Galimba? <br /> GALIMBA: Aye. <br /> KAY: Commissioner Raffipiy? <br /> RAFFIPIY: Aye. <br /> KAY: Commissioner Replogle? <br /> REPLOGLE: Aye. <br /> KAY: And Chair Au? <br /> AU: Aye. <br /> KAY: Thank you, Mr. Chair motion carries six (6) nothing. <br /> 17 <br /> EXHIBIT C <br />