My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2022-01-06 Windward Exh C (PL-REZ-2021-000008)
>
Planning Department
>
Leeward/Windward Planning Commission
>
Minutes & Exhibits Transcripts
>
2003-2022 Exhibits Transcripts
>
2022
>
2022-01-06 Windward Exh C (PL-REZ-2021-000008)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/3/2022 10:41:51 AM
Creation date
2/3/2022 10:41:42 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
18
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
AU: Okay, is everybody back? I'd like to bring back the Thursday, January 6 h Windward <br /> Planning Commission back from recess, the time is 10:48 a.m. and I do say that we have our <br /> commissioners on. So, I'm going to go ahead and get started on. <br /> KEKAL Chair Au? <br /> AU: Yes. <br /> KEKAL I would just like to since this is kind of a unique situation. I want to get a couple <br /> clarifications before we move forward with this agenda item. The first is, is Commissioner <br /> Aguinaldo the applicant in this application? If somebody could answer that question to me. <br /> ARAI: Yes, he is. <br /> KEKAL Okay. Beforehand I need to ask my commissioners then. Does everybody feel that <br /> they can be impartial and unbiased while reviewing this application? Does anybody feel they <br /> have a problem voting on this application? Okay, I just want to make that clear, as this is kind of <br /> an issue of first impression. Commissioner Replogle did you have a question? You're unmuted. <br /> REPLOGLE: Yes. I have no doubts about Commissioner Aguinaldo, but I think and I'm not <br /> positive on this. But my feeling is that maybe he shouldn't be here while we deliberate. He <br /> should be able to answer questions or all that about it, but I don't know that he should be part of <br /> that. <br /> KEKAL Yes, I agree, I think that he is recused from this proceeding as a commissioner but he is <br /> appearing fully as an applicant. Therefore, he cannot participate in discussion and deliberations <br /> and voting for this application. So, please "—" as your fellow Commissioner for this next <br /> agenda item. Does everybody understand? Okay. <br /> CLARKSON: I just have a question. Has there been any development on the guidelines that are <br /> process for conflict of interest this last year and, if so, did those guidelines speak to this issue, <br /> yet? <br /> KEKAL Not at this time, usually this kind of thing would go before the Board of Ethics for <br /> them to make a decision on whether there be a conflict but since he's recusing and not also <br /> appear as a commissioner. I would guess that there wouldn't be a problem but again I'm not the <br /> Board of Ethics so I can't make that decision. But that would usually be the guiding force in this <br /> kind of situation. But no, for your original question there hasn't been any new developments or <br /> anything that addresses this situation in particular. <br /> CAMPBELL: May I jumped in for a moment, this is Jean Campbell in case you can't see me. <br /> Malia you were breaking up a little bit when you were telling us about the "—". I understand <br /> that Commissioner Aguinaldo is appearing as an applicant and, as such, he should be able to <br /> participate during the applicant's presentation. What I heard from Commissioner Replogle was <br /> some concern about Commissioner Aguinaldo being present during the discussion. So, could <br /> 2 <br /> EXHIBIT C <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.