Laserfiche WebLink
C. YUEN:And the current access is on that and the -? <br />FUKE:That’s correct. <br />C. YUEN:The current recommendation, recommended condition is that the <br />access be moved off of that? <br />FUKE:Correct, to an adjoining property to the mauka side. <br />C. YUEN:Yes. Can I ask the Department of Public Works for comment. <br />FUJIKAWA:Will Ki please step forward. You may proceed. <br />EMLER:You have a specific question for me? <br />C. YUEN:Is there a reason why the access should be moved off of this <br />particular property? Is there a problem with creating an access on this lot? <br />EMLER:We have no objection to allowing the Applicant flexibility to <br />provide the access on their own property provided they have shared, they allow shared <br />access with the adjoining property. That was one of the issues. <br />The other reason why we suggested that it be moved is because it makes, the alignment <br />makes sense because there’s an existing stub-out that appears here on the map; and to <br />make the intersection 90 degrees or normal, to Waikoloa Road, it just made sense to turn <br />it in here. And, of course, we didn’t really know the relationship between properties; but <br />we prefer to, you know, that alignment in order to have the shared access, primarily. <br />C. YUEN:Can they make it 90, if they realign the road, can they make an <br />access hit Waikoloa Road at 90 degrees? <br />EMLER:They could if they realigned their road, yes. <br />C. YUEN:Is there anything on this, Jeff, that you want to say, anything <br />further? <br />DARROW:No. <br />C. YUEN:Given that, we would not object to the wording of the proposed <br />condition. <br />FUJIKAWA:Mr. Fuke, you have any other questions? <br />FUKE:No, except that I believe that Commissioner Springer may have <br />some questions regarding the issue relative to the Waikoloa Village Association, the <br />4 <br /> <br />