My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2004-01-30 BayPacific
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Leeward/Windward Planning Commission
>
Minutes & Exhibits Transcripts
>
2003-2022 Exhibits Transcripts
>
2004
>
2004-01-30 BayPacific
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/13/2011 9:58:19 AM
Creation date
6/13/2011 9:58:06 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
18
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Mr. Fuke indicated, if this got on the General Plan LUPAG map with that revision that <br />took place when Lono Lyman was Planning Director and Dante Carpenter was Mayor, <br />that was all just about ’87, ’88. I remember all that was going on. And yet this transfer <br />that we’re looking at is dated ’88 also. So, anyway, I guess, that’s all I have to say. <br />Thank you. <br />FUJIKAWA:Any other questions, Commissioners? Kubota? <br />KUBOTA:I have a question for Mr. Fuke. On your communication dated <br />th <br />January 8, specifically, Roadways and Traffic, Nos. 2 and 3, you disagree with some of <br />the requirements that DPW is requesting and you have your rationale for them. I noticed <br />that in Conditions E and G of the Change of Zone application, those specific references <br />are conditioned. May I have your response to that? <br />FUKE:Sure. Subsequent to drafting that response, we’ve had a number of <br />discussions with Mr. Cook, the developer, as well as his engineer; and all things <br />considered, it was decided that what the Department of Public Works had recommended <br />may be best for the overall project, you know, with the additional amendment as we <br />suggested earlier. And, so, as a result, you know, I would like to, at this point, then <br />publicly kind of amend what we had stated further. So, to date, the conditions that your <br />staff is recommending with the additional suggestion that we’ve offered, you know, <br />would be totally acceptable. <br />KUBOTA:Thank you. <br />FUJIKAWA:Any other questions? If not, Mr. Cook, you have the floor. <br />COOK:Thank you, Chairman. We first started working with Waikoloa <br />Village Community Association back in 2001. And looking at this area for development, <br />we viewed Waikoloa as an area that’s just growing in size in the community. And <br />looking at the General Plan showing the proposed Industrial zoning for this particular <br />area, we kind of zeroed in on the quarry site that had already been developed and used for <br />over 15 years and came up with a plan for a small Light Industrial park. We felt like that <br />by creating industrial land a self-storage facility within the community, it would allow <br />people living there to not have to travel 15 to 20 miles either into Waimea or into Kona <br />and small business people would be allowed to rent space in the warehouse area. Our <br />preliminary layout we had was about a third of the property for a self-storage facility that <br />would be growing as the neighborhood grew. The middle portion we laid out <br />warehouses. We’ve laid them out such that they have adequate parking and probably <br />more parking than most industrial areas. We have laid them out with the thought in mind <br />of users that can access as well as customers. And we just think there’s a great need in <br />the community and, hopefully, the Planning Commission agrees with this. <br />FUJIKAWA:Thank you. Any questions, Commissioners, for Mr. Cook? Okay. <br />Thank you. Can you step back. And I have three people who signed up to testify on this <br />application. Will the three parties please step up forward? Leighton Yuen, Lu-, <br />8 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.