|
YOSHINA: Chair Kossow, this is Dwayne. I have a question for James. If you were to
<br /> include those areas, you're talking about in District 1, what would be the population
<br /> changes, or do you know? Thank you.
<br /> HUSTACE: Thank you, Commissioner Yoshina. I'm not sure off the top of my head. I
<br /> can look quickly. It looks like those three census blocks have zero population in them, so
<br /> it could be an easy switch and fix, to answer your question.
<br /> YOSHINA: Thank you.
<br /> KOSSOW: Ms. Lui.
<br /> LUL Yes, thank you, Chair Kossow. I originally liked you're map, Commissioner Lopez,
<br /> because it was trying to make as little change as possible. I have since changed my view
<br /> though. I think partly hearing from some of the folks, like along the Wailuku River. So, I
<br /> guess at this point, I do not like the fact that, as it stands now, both Hilo and Waimea
<br /> have parts of those places within District 1. I don't think that's a great idea. And also, I
<br /> think in your current map, District 1 goes all the way to Kapa`au, which relates much
<br /> more to Hawi. So, I guess at this point, in terms of just District 1, I think I like James'
<br /> District 9 map the best and would still think that we should use that and the original too,
<br /> that we chose, to work off of. Thank you. I yield.
<br /> KOSSOW: Thank you, Ms. Lui. Any other discussion? (No response.) Alright, we'll go
<br /> ahead andstaff, if you can go ahead and open up Mr. Hustace's. Is it labeled
<br /> "2_111221"? Did you make that name up? Okay. I was going to say, that's a lot of maps!
<br /> HUSTACE: Chair, if I may,just some clarification for the Commissioners.
<br /> KOSSOW: Yeah, Mr. Hustace.
<br /> HUSTACE: I was approached by the Elections Office to help with the public website.
<br /> Where we see—where the public can easily, rather than logging in to the
<br /> Reapportionment Commission and the mapping software, but rather see the end product
<br /> of the maps. So, I'm trying to work with them and the GIS team at the County to make it
<br /> a little bit clearer on that. Right now, there are one from the public, and there are about 15
<br /> from the Commissioners. Somewhere around that number, correct? Something like that.
<br /> At our last meeting, we selected to work, going forward, on two maps, right? On Chair
<br /> Kossow's map, number 12, and then one of mines, which was titled Number 9. We are
<br /> trying to make sure that they are labeled appropriately. So, they should be labeled, like
<br /> Working Draft 1, and Working Draft 2. We wanted to make sure that was clear on the
<br /> website. Following that, hopefully, my proposal was to have folders on the public
<br /> software application map. That would have those two maps in distinct folders, and any
<br /> subsequent iterations would be within those folders. All the other maps should still
<br /> remain up there, but maybe in another folder called Additional Maps To Be Considered.
<br /> Just for clarify sake. `Cause right now, if you log on the public site, it just shows them
<br /> basically, on when they were submitted, or I think maybe actually, alphabetically after
<br /> 10
<br />
|