My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2021-11-23 Redistricting Commission minutes (8th Session Part 1)
PublicDocuments
>
County Clerk - Council
>
County Clerk
>
Redistricting Commission
>
2021 Redistricting Commission
>
Minutes
>
2021-11-23 Redistricting Commission minutes (8th Session Part 1)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/15/2022 11:16:43 AM
Creation date
2/15/2022 9:54:30 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
85
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
zoomed in a little bit on it? So I can see what's going on there? (Pause while <br /> Commissioner Bath directs staffprojecting the map onto the screen.) Thank you for your <br /> efforts on this. What I'm seeing here is that District 5 has become more of a District 4 <br /> situation. And the area that you've added in your efforts is very much District 4. That <br /> area that we're looking at, the green area, those people polarize towards Pahoa. Their <br /> only way in and out of that area is through Highway 130 unless they take the Chain of <br /> Craters Road. So, one of the goals that I was thinking to do, is to create districts that <br /> would have the Kalapana and all those areas that can't really access District 5, yet they're <br /> in District 5, having them into District 4. And in order to do that, unfortunately, HPP will <br /> have to be split. But this to me, is totally illogical and doesn't really make sense for <br /> District 4, and definitely not for District 5. What's happened here is District 5 is going to <br /> have to be represented, the Council person who's representing District 5, is actually <br /> going to have to represent District 5 and District 4. Which is sort of happening now, and <br /> it's kind of problematic for the people. Did you split Pahoa town, or did you keep it intact <br /> together in this? <br /> LOPEZ: I believe I kept it intact. <br /> BATH: Okay. Can we zoom in on Pahoa town? `Cause it looks like it might be—Pahoa <br /> town is actually split in this area. And the problem with that is that the Plan for Pahoa, <br /> has two Council people. Oh, I see what you did. Okay, I see what you did here. Alright. <br /> So, actually you've moved Pahoa town into District 5, and Pahoa town is District 4, <br /> lower Puna's town. Where they do their commerce and shop, a lot of people. And so, to <br /> put that into District 5, doesn't make a whole lot of sense. But thank you for your efforts. <br /> I yield. <br /> YOSHINA: Chair Kossow, this is Dwayne. <br /> KOSSOW: Mr. Yoshina. <br /> YOSHINA: Yeah, I just want some clarification. Where we supposed to—according to <br /> the agenda and my understanding, we were going to discuss two maps as a Commission. <br /> And now we have additional information so, how are we approaching this? <br /> KOSSOW: Mr. Yoshina, I think we can keep it open for discussion if any Commissioners <br /> want to introduce any other maps. That's fine. But we do have two working drafts, and <br /> any discussion that comes out of it, then we can implement it into the working drafts. <br /> YOSHINA: Okay, thank you. <br /> KOSSOW: Thank you, Mr. Yoshina. Is there any further discussion for Mr. Lopez's <br /> map? <br /> HUSTACE: Chair. <br /> KOSSOW: Mr. Hustace. <br /> 7 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.