My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
PD BACKGROUND REPORT (PL-PDI-2021-002)
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Leeward/Windward Planning Commission
>
Board Packets
>
*Background/Recommendation Reports (June 2020-Sept 2022)
>
2022
>
2022-03-03 Windward
>
Item #1 PD Initiated (Ellis Jacob Hester Trust) (REZ 1052 _ PL-REZ-2021-000002)
>
PD BACKGROUND REPORT (PL-PDI-2021-002)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/17/2022 10:26:36 AM
Creation date
2/17/2022 10:25:22 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
47
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
18. Land Study Bureau's Productivity Rating: "B" or"Good" (TMK: (3) 9-6-006:004) <br /> and"B" and"C" or"Fair" (TMK: (3) 9-6-005:018). <br /> 19. ALISH: Prime Agricultural Land and Other Important Agricultural Land. <br /> 20. FIRM: Flood Zone "X", an area of minimal flood hazard. <br /> 21. Flora/Fauna Resources: There were no professional surveys conducted of the floral or <br /> faunal resources of the site, as the site was extensively planted in sugar cane in the past. <br /> The flora of the uncultivated portions of the site is dominated by fallow sugar cane and <br /> non-native plants. According to the applicant,there are no known federally listed or <br /> endangered flora species at the site.No known federally listed threatened or endangered <br /> faunal species are known to nest at or inhabit the project site. <br /> 22. Archaeological Resources: Condition J of the subject APD ordinance required the <br /> applicant to complete an archaeological inventory survey (AIS) for the project area and <br /> any preservation, mitigation, and/or burial treatment plans that may be required or receive <br /> a"no effect" letter from the State Historic Preservation Division (SHPD). Haun & <br /> Associates completed an AIS of the entire project area, which found that the area had <br /> been heavily impacted by historic and modern sugar cane cultivation. Moreover, no <br /> remains of the Meyer Camp and associated cemetery were identified by the survey. <br /> Finally, the AIS found a single archaeological site (remnants of a historic flume) and <br /> determined that the site was, "only significant for its information content and the <br /> inventory- level documentation will be sufficient to warrant a recommendation of no <br /> further work or preservation. "By letter dated August 12, 2004, SHPD confirmed receipt <br /> of the final AIS and found that, "no historic properties will be affected by the <br /> development of the property. " <br /> 23. Cultural or Native Gathering Rights: There are no known traditional and customary <br /> Native Hawaiian rights being practiced on the site. <br /> 24. Public Access: There is no record of designated public access to the shoreline or <br /> maintain areas that traverse the properties. <br /> PUBLIC FACILITIES AND SERVICES <br /> 25. Access: Access to the site is via the extension of a private road known as Meyer Camp <br /> Road, an extension of Huapala Street. This road has a right-of-way of approximately 50 <br /> -4- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.