Laserfiche WebLink
water, because that means we'll get more MGDs coming to the plant. Until we get there, then <br />you're right. Then probably we could tap to more customers. But 1 MGD per day, it's not <br />enough R-1 water even for a golf course, because I think one of the golf courses we were <br />talking to, they are almost in the range of 1.5 to 2.0 MGD usage. And the regional park may be <br />able to consume all of the R-1 water that we're going to produce. So mathematically, we must <br />work within what we got currently to work with. <br /> <br />Vice Chair Gaffney asked what is the status of the regional park. There's been no public <br />discussion about the regional park proceeding. <br /> <br />Director Mansour said they are moving in with Phase 1 eventually. They are not going to build it <br />all at once. I think it was like $220 million, similar to the R-1 water’s $162 million price tag, the <br />one that currently was designed for, he said. So definitely they are trying to build it in phases. <br />Eventually they're going to get there, but also it's driven by the need for water as well. We’re <br />going to work hand in hand. We projected probably within three years at least Phase 1 will be <br />in place. So that's an ongoing discussion with them and trying to figure out how they're going to <br />fund it, and what have you. The big picture here, the bottom line really comes to funding. You <br />guys all know the County’s general fund is only $500 million. So when you have a project like <br />this it takes the entire county budget, it's not sustainable for the county to fund such a project, <br />even if they float bonds or what have you because our debt ratio will go out the roof. But that's <br />more for the Finance Department to talk about it. But as to the principle of financing, we need <br />to look a different way to be able to deliver our projects. <br /> <br />Vice Chair Gaffney asked if the County is going to pay DEM for use of the R-1 water in the <br />regional park. <br /> <br />Director Mansour said he didn’t know. We haven't gotten there yet, but he would imagine it <br />would be a memorandum of agreement between us and them, he said. <br /> <br />Chair Adams asked the Vice Chair to put this discussion on the agenda for the next meeting to <br />get answers to specific questions and get some background from DEM. <br /> <br />Commissioner Fulton asked that the Director share the Department’s priorities. It's very easy <br />for people to grasp the need for repairs or replacement to the Hilo Wastewater Treatment <br />Plant, because it's a concrete physical structure. If a wall collapses, we're going to have <br />something visual and something really bad happening. What's a little harder for people to <br />understand, I think, is the reality of what's going on at that Honokōhau Small Boat Harbor and <br />the perpetual chronic dumping of polluted water into that sump. So that's an ongoing problem <br />that is destructive to our water quality. Those waters on the west side are federally impaired. <br />We know the Hilo plant is at the top, but could you share the next two priorities on your list? <br />Do you have a 1, 2, 3? <br /> <br />Hilo is No. 1, Director Mansour said, and it’s tied with Pāhala and Nā‘ālehu because under the <br />Administrative Order on Consent, the EPA made it clear we could receive a fine up to $63,000 <br />7 <br /> <br /> <br />