My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
PD Recommendation Report (PL-SMA-2021-000007)
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Leeward/Windward Planning Commission
>
Board Packets
>
*Background/Recommendation Reports (June 2020-Sept 2022)
>
2022
>
2022-04-07 Windward
>
Item #1 Holcomb Family Trust (PL-SMA-2021-000007)
>
PD Recommendation Report (PL-SMA-2021-000007)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/28/2022 10:27:41 AM
Creation date
3/28/2022 10:27:27 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
14
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
following: <br /> In review of the SMA guidelines as listed under HRS 205A-26, the proposed <br /> development is consistent with the objectives and policies as provided by Chapter <br /> 205A-26, HRS, and Special Management Area guidelines contained in Rule No. 9 of <br /> the Planning Commission Rules of Practice and Procedure. <br /> The purpose of Chapter 205A-26, Hawaii Revised Statutes (HRS) and Rule 9 of <br /> the Planning Commission Rules of Practice and Procedure, is to preserve, protect, and <br /> where possible,to restore the natural resources of the coastal zone areas. Therefore,special <br /> controls on development within an area along the shoreline are necessary to avoid <br /> permanent loss of valuable resources and the foreclosure of management options. The <br /> objectives and policies of Chapter 205A-26, HRS and Rule 9-10(h) include, but are not <br /> limited to, the protection of coastal recreational resources, historic resources, scenic and <br /> open space resources, coastal ecosystems, marine resources, beaches, and controlling <br /> development in coastal hazard areas. <br /> The following factors of a proposal, although not limited to same,may constitute a <br /> substantial adverse effect on the environment when the proposed use,activity, or operation: <br /> Involves an irrevocable commitment to loss or destruction of any natural or <br /> cultural resource, including but not limited to, historic sites and view planes outlined in <br /> the General Plan or other adopted plans: No valuable natural or cultural resources would <br /> be committed or lost. Several common native plants are present, especially near the cliffs <br /> where there will be no disturbance other than removal of invasive trees. No native <br /> ecosystems or valuable flora or fauna would be adversely affected. An archaeological <br /> inventory survey (AIS) determined that two (2) sites that lack physical integrity but are <br /> associated with former sugarcane cultivation were found. No adverse effects to historic <br /> sites would occur. A path to the top of a shoreline point accessed only by a series of now- <br /> defunct ladders but formerly used for shoreline fishing will be maintained and improved <br /> for access. No valuable cultural resources and practices such as shoreline access, fishing, <br /> gathering, hunting, or access to ceremonial sites would be adversely affected by the <br /> proposed project. <br /> Curtails the range ofbenefzcial uses ofthe environment: The current beneficial uses <br /> -4- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.