My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
PD Background Report (PL-SMA-2021-000007)
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Leeward/Windward Planning Commission
>
Board Packets
>
*Background/Recommendation Reports (June 2020-Sept 2022)
>
2022
>
2022-04-07 Windward
>
Item #1 Holcomb Family Trust (PL-SMA-2021-000007)
>
PD Background Report (PL-SMA-2021-000007)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/28/2022 10:41:35 AM
Creation date
3/28/2022 10:32:34 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
407
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Chapter 11-200.1-13, Hawai'i Administrative Rules, outlines those factors agencies must consider when <br /> determining whether an Action has significant effects: <br /> (a) In considering the significance of potential environmental effects, agencies shall consider and <br /> evaluate the sum of effects of the proposed action on the quality of the environment. <br /> (b) In determining whether an action may have a significant effect on the environment, the agency shall <br /> consider every phase of a proposed action, the expected impacts, and the proposed mitigation <br /> measures. In most instances, an action shall be determined to have a significant effect on the <br /> environment if it may: <br /> 1. Irrevocably commit a natural, cultural, or historic resource. No valuable natural or cultural resource <br /> would be committed or lost. Several common native plants are present, especially near the cliffs where <br /> there will be no disturbance other than removal of invasive trees. No native ecosystems or valuable flora <br /> or fauna would be adversely affected. An archaeological inventory survey determined that two sites that <br /> lack physical integrity but are associated with former sugarcane cultivation were found. No adverse <br /> effects to historic sites would occur. A path to the top of a shoreline point accessed only by a series of <br /> now-defunct ladders but formerly used for shoreline fishing will be maintained. No valuable cultural <br /> resources and practices such as shoreline access, fishing, gathering, hunting, or access to ceremonial <br /> sites would be adversely affected in any way. <br /> 2. Curtail the range of beneficial uses of the environment. No restriction of beneficial uses would occur by <br /> residential use on this lot. <br /> 3. Conflict with the State's environmental policies or long-term environmental goals established by law. <br /> The State's long-term environmental policies are set forth in Chapter 344, HRS. The broad goals of this <br /> policy are to conserve natural resources and enhance the quality of life. The project is environmentally <br /> benign and minor, and it is thus consistent with all elements of the State's long-term environmental <br /> policies. <br /> 4. Have a substantial adverse effect on the economic welfare, social welfare, or cultural practices of the <br /> community and State. The project would not have any substantial effect on the economic or social <br /> welfare of the Big Island community or the State of Hawai'i. <br /> 5. Have a substantial adverse effect on public health. The project would not affect public health and <br /> safety in any way. Wastewater will be disposed of in conformance with State Department of Health <br /> regulations. <br /> 6. Involve adverse secondary impacts, such as population changes or effects on public facilities. The <br /> small scale of the proposed project would not produce any major secondary impacts, such as population <br /> changes or effects on public facilities. <br /> 7. Involve a substantial degradation of environmental quality. The project is minor and environmentally <br /> benign, and thus it would not contribute to environmental degradation. <br /> 8. Be individually limited but cumulatively have substantial adverse effect upon the environment or <br /> involves a commitment for larger actions. The adverse effects of building a single-family residence are <br /> limited to very minor and temporary disturbance to traffic, air quality, noise, and visual quality during <br /> construction. This area is fairly isolated from sensitive receptors. There are no traffic issues associated <br /> with the highway access point,which provides for only a handful of lightly visited properties that generate <br /> only negligible traffic. There are no substantial government or private projects in construction or planning <br /> in the area, and no accumulation of adverse construction effects would be expected. Other than the <br /> precautions for preventing adverse effects during construction listed above, no special mitigation <br /> measures should be required to counteract the small adverse cumulative effect. <br /> 9. Have a substantial adverse effect on a rare, threatened, or endangered species, or its habitat. The site <br /> has been surveyed for threatened and endangered plants, and none are present. Other than Hawaiian <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.