My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2021-12-02 Merit Appeals Board Minutes
PublicDocuments
>
Human Resources
>
Merit Appeals Board
>
Minutes
>
2021
>
2021-12-02 Merit Appeals Board Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/13/2022 1:18:05 PM
Creation date
4/13/2022 1:15:50 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
59
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Merit Appeals Board <br />December 2, 2021 <br />Just to share with you all, we had eight applicants come out for the written exam for a Clerk III <br />position. So, we are in some interesting times and the re—and the information and the research <br />I've been gathering, it's not a local issue, it's a nationwide issue that we're experiencing. <br />So, fortunately, NeoGov, the company we have the software with—has been very helpful in <br />helping us strategize new recruitment methods. So, we're really in a period where we're looking <br />at other opportunities for recruitment and how we recruit. <br />And so, Lee's job is very challenging because it's not only in screening anymore, we have to <br />come up with new ways of recruitment. So, I just wanted to share that as well. <br />CHR. CABANAS: Thank you, Waylen, Can I open it up for questions, then, starting with <br />Mr. Ventura in Kona. Mel, do you have any questions for Lee? <br />MR. VENTURA: Yeah. Yeah, I do. Hi, Lee, do you find that over time the results you get on <br />these written exams that they relate to job success, like the higher the better someone does on <br />the exam the—down the road, that person ends up being more successful at his or her job? <br />MS. BOTELHO: Mr. Ventura, I'm sorry, but I don't know if we keep those statistics. Once an <br />eligia person is referred to a department and a selection is made, we the Recruitment or the <br />Central HR doesn't track those applicants to see which of those are most successful. <br />The written exam, basically, is to rank them on the list, right. Some people don't take exam <br />don't do well with written exams. But they can, certainly, perform the job if—of—given that <br />opportunity. <br />Once they're referred, everyone who is referred to a department is on a level playing field. The <br />department doesn't know the ranking or the outcome—where they placed from the written exam. <br />So, it is really up to the applicant to sell themselves during that interview and assessment <br />process. So, I don't know that we have statistics. Did you have anything to add, Waylen? <br />MR. LEOPOLDINO: I just wanted to add that we just implemented the written exams in 2020, <br />so one of my things is to establish some metrics with regard to written exams and how that plays <br />out over time. Because that's a very valid question, Mr. Ventura. So, that's definitely on our <br />radar because if it's not effective, we have to look at a more effective way in implementing our <br />written exams. <br />But we just re -implemented the written exams so, at this time, it's difficult to say how it's <br />playing into job performance. <br />MR. VENTURA: Okay. And those that carry the standard weight in an applicant's overall <br />evaluation or is it pretty subjective and considered with all the other things? <br />Page 17 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.