My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2022-03-17 Leeward Exh A (Item 1 Cravalho REZ 21-000248)
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Leeward/Windward Planning Commission
>
Minutes & Exhibits Transcripts
>
2003-2022 Exhibits Transcripts
>
2022
>
2022-03-17 Leeward Exh A (Item 1 Cravalho REZ 21-000248)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/21/2022 5:04:19 PM
Creation date
4/21/2022 5:04:09 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
15
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
review process, which is where should the Change of Zone be approved, it does allow the <br /> possibility for a range of uses and facilities that there's this process called Plan Approval Review <br /> and we'd be willing or amenable to a condition that says that anything submitted for plan <br /> approval review, that opportunities for review by the action committee can be factored into that <br /> process as well. And that would give, again, another opportunity for the action committee to <br /> weigh in on any specific changes. <br /> So, again, continuing the meeting to a future meeting date would give us that opportunity to <br /> explore further with the Planning Department as well. <br /> VITOUSEK: Okay, thank you. Deputy Director Darrow. <br /> DARROW: Thank you, Chairman Vitousek. I just wanted to, I was going to try to chime in on <br /> this earlier, but I didn't get an opportunity so, before we finish, I just wanted to touch on a few <br /> areas that we were discussing. Number one, Commissioner Kanuha brought up the fact that this <br /> is a very strange zoning for this particular property. Ag-20 on a 7,500 square foot lot in the <br /> middle of the urban core of Hawi, with the zoning being State Land Use Urban. So, it's, it's very <br /> unusual. I did take a look back at the original zone map that created the parcel created the zoning <br /> that was initially done in 1967, and it identifies the zoning of the properties along Haw! Road to <br /> the east as commercial, and the ones beyond Hoea Road to the west it identifies as residential. <br /> But this particular property does not identify a particular zone. I'm not sure if they just said <br /> because it wasn't identified that they just went with Ag-20, but I think that's something that we <br /> should at least look at. <br /> But regardless of that, the other issues that came up was the consistency of the CDP. The CDP, <br /> it's not very specific. There are CDPs that actually have maps of particular areas within the <br /> district that show what the community wanted for their future land use pattern. In this particular <br /> one they rely on the General Plan Land Use Pattern, but they do make a statement that the <br /> development of a commercial core within the towns of Haw! and Kapa`au shall be encouraged. <br /> And that's specifically where this is located, within that core of Hawi. And we see that by the <br /> commercial zoning that's moving along Hawi, the main Hawi Road. The other thing that comes <br /> up, is when we look at commeragriculture, a lot of times the Planning Department relies on <br /> several resources to be able to provide us what sort of quality is that agricultural land. In this <br /> particular case, we look to the land study bureau that identifies what type of land, that soil is. If <br /> it's good soil or poor soil, and we also look at the, what's called the ALISH, the Agricultural <br /> Lands in the State of Hawaii. In this particular case, there are areas around the island where <br /> because there was existing urban development, they do not identify it in those maps. They just <br /> call it out as U, which is identified as existing urban development. In this particular case, this <br /> core is identified as U. It's not identified with a soil class, and so I thought I'd bring that up as <br /> well that this was part of that urban, existing urban development area and not considered as lands <br /> of importance for agriculture. <br /> Anyways,just areas that I thought might bring some clarity to what we were discussing. Thank <br /> you. <br /> 11 <br /> EXHIBIT A <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.