2022-03-17 Leeward Exh A (Item 1 Cravalho REZ 21-000248)

Home

whereby there would be a requirement that would go forth, that would carry over to do another round of community outreach and conversation? Is that possible? JACKSON: Typically, when we forward a letter up to Council, we forward what the vote was. So, if the vote was 4-0 for a favorable recommendation, that's what the Council would see. We could put something in the letter saying that the commission has requested that the applicant do another round of collaboration and consultation with the community. But there's nothing, really hooking the applicant into doing that, that I'm aware of. KANUHA: Yeah, but Maija VITOUSEK: Deputy Director. Deputy Director Darrow, go ahead. DARROW: I'm sorry, Commissioner Kanuha. Just, I just wanted to offer this suggestion. We only have four commissioners today. It doesn't look like we're going to get, or we may not get a vote one way or another. It hasn't been voted on at this time. If the applicant is amenable to defer this application to allow more time to speak with members of the community that Commissioner Paishon-Duarte is asking, for that communication to be done before feeling comfortable making a decision, the Planning Director and, or the Planning Department is amenable to defer. And we can, there can be a request from the commission specifically as to what type of reach out there should be before they come back. Then from that point, we would be able to consider it again and there would be also the possibility of having, a good chance of having additional commissioners on the commission as well. So, that's a thought that can be considered. VITOUSEK: So, my understanding is that because this was deferred by the Planning Commission the last time, the obligation to notify the interested parties falls to the Planning Department? JACKSON: That's correct. VITOUSEK: Okay. So DARROW: Again, it, the applicant can request a deferral as well. So VITOUSEK: Well, I'm just speak—talking about the last round when, were we able to notify the interested parties about the date of today's hearing? JACKSON: Yes. Yes. VITOUSEK: Was there any indication from them about whether their concerns had been resolved? Just given the fact that there was so much public testimony last meeting, and then there's been some pretty substantial changes to the project and now there's no public testimony at this meeting. So, do we have any indication whether maybe they liked the changes and that's why they're not here today? We didn't get any letters, we didn't get any JACKSON: Tracie, do you want to respond to that? 9 EXHIBIT A