Laserfiche WebLink
kind of commercial building. There are no landscaping requirements in single family residential <br />areas. <br />SIRACUSA: Thank you. That was my concern. <br />GRAHAM: Thank you. Any other questions of Jeff before we bring the applicant up? <br />I’d also like to indicate that I don’t have anyone signed up for public testimony. So if anyone <br />here would like to give public testimony, please let Sharon know. Okay, will the applicant come <br />forward, please. Could I swear you all in first. Raise your right hand please. Do you swear or <br />affirm to tell the Planning Commission today the truth regarding this matter? <br />TESTIFIERS: I do. <br />GRAHAM: Thank you. You may give your name and address; and go ahead with <br />your testimony, please. <br />LIM: Good morning, Mr. Chair and Members of the Commission. Steven Lim <br />from Carlsmith representing Big Isle Ventures LLC. And we would note that perhaps some of <br />the correspondence should be corrected to Big Isle Ventures when it moves up to the next step, <br />hopefully. With me to my left is Mr. Chris Manfredi from Big Isle Ventures LLC who’s one of <br />the principals. <br />MANFREDI: Good morning, Commissioners. Chris Manfredi, my address is PO Box <br />1109, Naalehu, Hawaii 96772. <br />LIM: We’ve received and reviewed the Planning Director’s background report, <br />and recommendation, and the proposed conditions of approval; and we concur with those <br />documents. I think just for two points of clarification, with regard to Condition D which requires <br />that the renovations and improvements to the existing dwelling be consistent with the current <br />appearance of the home shall be allowed, we discussed this with the Planning Director. And it’s <br />our understanding that he would approve any renovations, or additions, or modifications to the <br />existing home, so long as the end product had the current appearance of the existing home. And <br />with that, we’d accept that condition. <br />And the other clarification is that for Conditions I and J, those relate to affordable housing <br />requirements if the applicant develops residential units on the property. And as we are not <br />proposing the development of residential units we feel those don’t apply; however, we are <br />willing to leave those just in case that happens in the future. <br />Other than that we’d ask your support. I passed out some photos of the Mamalahoa frontage and <br />the Kukui Road frontage that kind of shows at least most of those edges. I didn’t have a photo of <br />the rear yard but, and it looks like there’s some small shrubs but not anything real significant. <br />These homes have been there since the 1930s or so. We do want to maintain all of the large trees <br />and plants that are there at this point in time. And we welcome the Director’s indication that he <br />would grant a variance from any of the requirements of Rule 17 for landscaping that would <br />enable us to keep those plants. Thank you. <br /> EXHIBIT B <br />5 <br /> <br />