My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2007-02-02 TBIG ISLE
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Leeward/Windward Planning Commission
>
Minutes & Exhibits Transcripts
>
2003-2022 Exhibits Transcripts
>
2007
>
2007-02-02 TBIG ISLE
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/13/2011 10:17:32 AM
Creation date
6/13/2011 10:17:24 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
10
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
GRAHAM: Commissioner Rho, just on your issue like on the conditions of approval, <br />C says access to the property from Highway 11 shall meet with the approval of the DOT. Yet <br />there is some issue with the Department of Transportation you were saying, right? <br />RHO: Well, it just concerned me that they brought that issue up and there is a <br />response, but then I just noticed that it was basically a shared driveway. I’m not sure where that <br />leads him, but I just wanted to point that out and get a comment from the applicant. <br />GRAHAM: Are you following this closely, Mr. Yuen? <br />YUEN: Well, I understand what he’s saying. I don’t want to take the condition <br />out, simple. I think that has been a pretty standard condition. I think that they need to have a <br />discussion themselves with the Department of Transportation emphasizing that the development <br />is limited to the existing home and that perhaps the Department of Transportation will then not <br />regard this as something that creates an issue for them, given that you have an existing access <br />driveway that does serve a number of homes. As a practical matter, there’s no question of <br />closing the driveway which would be more an attractive proposition from both, probably from <br />the Department of Transportation’s point of view. You’d be in a position where the driveway <br />would still be there, you would force them to create another driveway, you would have a <br />condition that they could only use the Kukui Road driveway. On the other hand there would be <br />other people using the existing driveway. So it’s a little, unless there’s some kind of physical <br />barrier that then also prevents people from using that driveway to access their commercial <br />property which I think is hard because it’s probably laid out already that you use that driveway -. <br />So that’s why, you know, I don’t see us putting a condition in now that they must use Kukui <br />Road. On the other hand I cannot see taking the existing condition out that says they have to get <br />approval from Department of Transportation. <br />GRAHAM: Mr. Lim, you had a -? <br />LIM: Our plan was to basically approach the Department of Transportation and <br />indicate to them to what the proposed use is, which would be relatively, you know, low impact <br />we think; and we don’t believe that we’re going to be required to implement any further <br />driveway improvements. I mean this area of the Highway 11 at Mamalahoa Highway is, I <br />believe the right-of-way is only something like 50 feet and the pavement maybe at 40. So at <br />some point in time if the Department of Transportation desires to improve that roadway they’re <br />going to need additional right-of-way. And the big question is going to be whether to take out <br />those trees fronting this property and other properties along the roadway. So I think that big <br />decision is going to be made some time after we’re all out of here. <br />YUEN: What’s the speed limit there? <br />LIM: It’s 35 at the long stretch and drops to 25 fronting the school. <br />YUEN: And there is that neighboring CV property which does have a driveway <br />access. <br /> EXHIBIT B <br />8 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.