Laserfiche WebLink
we're looking at these political divisions for the island and the County here, the number <br /> we're targeted is 22,232. Really the ethical question is, what is a good number to <br /> represent? It's really a bigger question, and maybe one that needs to be delved a little bit <br /> further into. Like what is that perfect number for a representation ratio for a Council <br /> Member? So,just putting that out there. Thank you. <br /> KOSSOW: Ms. Lui. <br /> LUL Just one last consideration as well. I listened to Brenda's concerns which I hadn't <br /> thought about. Usually, the decision-making bodies have an odd number of people in <br /> them so that it doesn't come to a tie. So, that's just another consideration. Would we ask <br /> for eleven (11), as opposed to ten? I yield. <br /> KOSSOW: Thank you, Ms. Lui. Any other discussion? (No response.) Okay, without any <br /> other discussion or motions, I'm going to move over to agenda item number 3. Mr. <br /> Kauka? <br /> KAUKA: New business number: <br /> 3. Review and discussion of County Charter and Code sections that relate to redistricting <br /> The County redistricting process is guided by County Charter Section 3-17 and <br /> Hawaii County Code Chapter 36. Commissioners may discuss their experiences <br /> working within the parameters of the language from these documents and <br /> consider making recommendations to appropriate entities or individuals for <br /> proposing any legislative amendments that could improve the redistricting <br /> process, including, but not limited to, the timing and content of public hearings. <br /> KOSSOW: Thank you, Mr. Kauka. I'm going to pass this over to Mr. Hustace who <br /> introduced this agenda item. Thank you, Mr. Hustace, for adding this on. <br /> KAUKA: Chair, sorry for interrupting. But before that,just want to state for the record <br /> that Commissioner Ah Nee has now joined us. <br /> KOSSOW: Thank you very much. Mr. Hustace. <br /> HUSTACE: Thank you, Chair. I know there's probably—and I'd like to hear some of the <br /> thoughts from my fellow commissioners about the process we've been through. I mean, <br /> we still have a little bit more to go, but this is something we can keep talking about. I just <br /> wanted to offer some thoughts on this. In ten years, this body, this Commission, may <br /> have a different suite of technology. I think from the previous Commission, we've had <br /> definitely a leg up with the software that we've been given to utilize for the purpose of <br /> redistricting. I think unfortunately in our case, we saw the census data quite late in our <br /> tenure here. That was a bit of detriment to the whole process, and I think it really kind of <br /> waylaid our work a bit in trying to get going and moving on things. We've received some <br /> testimony and I appreciate the testimony at the top of the meeting here. Some of the <br /> thoughts I've had on the public hearings, and I'd welcome thoughts on this because the <br /> 12 <br />