My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2007-02-02 TCELLCO
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Leeward/Windward Planning Commission
>
Minutes & Exhibits Transcripts
>
2003-2022 Exhibits Transcripts
>
2007
>
2007-02-02 TCELLCO
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/13/2011 10:17:41 AM
Creation date
6/13/2011 10:17:36 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
15
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Waimea town. This would be in the Lakeland area moving towards Waimea town. The area of <br />the application is identified with this orange dot. This is right along the Hawaii Belt Road, that’s <br />running in an east-west direction between Waimea and Honokaa. The applicant in this case, <br />Cellco Partnership dba Verizon Wireless, is requesting a special permit to allow the <br />establishment of a 150-foot monopole telecommunications tower as well as an equipment shelter <br />and fencing on 2,000 square feet of land on a 418-acre parcel that’s identified in this particular <br />area. <br />The reason for the request is to be able to bridge the communications gap between Waimea and <br />Honokaa. At this time there is very little signal in that area in regards to any kind of any cellular <br />transmissions. I’m sure many of you might have experienced that while driving through that <br />area. <br />The applicants do have a tower existing within Waimea as well as Honokaa. So this tower <br />would be able to bridge that gap. Looking at the site plans that are submitted by the applicant, <br />we have just a plot plan identifying the location of the tower as well as the equipment shelter and <br />the fencing. And this is basically the 2,000 square foot area, this would be on the plot plan with <br />the easement showing. The map does not show the location of the highway. <br />Looking at the antenna design, we’re looking at a monopole antenna that’s going to have 12 <br />panel antennas that are 8 feet in height. These are located at the top of the tower. There will be <br />three sectors with 4 panel antennas on each sector facing in different directions. It would be <br />identified in this type of configuration. <br />Originally when the Planning Director had distributed the background and recommendation, the <br />Planning Director was recommending that the application be denied, mainly because of negative <br />visual impacts that the tower would create from the highway as well as to residents in the area. <br />The Planning Director requested that the applicant make attempts to be able to either find an area <br />to relocate or to lower the height of the tower. The applicant had made attempts and had <br />submitted information in regards to their findings. And, at this point, the Director reviewed <br />those findings and felt that rather than being able to have to place additional towers to be able to <br />bridge this gap that we would be able to, it would be better to just have the one tower and then <br />place some conditions in there to help minimize the visual impact. <br />Looking at the conditions, Condition No. 4 was added in to try to be able to minimize those <br />visual impacts. It states that the applicant shall plant, establish trees that will grow to a height of <br />100 plus feet along the north, west, and east boundaries of the proposed project site to minimize <br />any negative visual impacts along the highway. <br />Additionally, there have been concerns regarding easements. When the applicants for these cell <br />towers get a location on a property it’s usually within that 2000-square foot area for that project <br />area. The landscaping usually will go outside of that area. So in the past they’ve had problems <br />with the applicants being able to get an easement to plant along the outside. So we’ve requested <br />in Condition No. 5 that the applicant be able to provide that easement for the landscaping along <br />the outside. <br /> EXHIBIT A <br />2 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.