Laserfiche WebLink
ALAMEDA:Commissioner Springer. <br />SPRINGER:Well, I€m just concerned that there is apparently some information that are <br />in the files of the parties before us that we don€t have. The only map that I have was in my <br />background report, Exhibit I. And as I€m looking at the table there, it doesn€t look like it€s the <br />same map. Do we need to be concerned about this? We€re having a discussion based on <br />information that we don€t have before us. <br />ALAMEDA:Okay. Let me ask if Commissioner Watanabe had that same line of <br />thinking or you had a different question, like missing information? <br />WATANABE:I was, I thought maybe we were running out of questions and I was <br />prepared to make a motion. On the other hand, in response to Ms. Springer€s question, I think <br />themorerelevantportionofthemapreallyisjustthelocationofthelotanditsproximityto <br />public views as well as surrounding neighbor views. <br />ALAMEDA:Commissioner Springer, your response on this? <br />WATANABE:Am I completely off on this? Are you -? <br />SPRINGER:Well, I€m thinking that if there€s a, I€m not sure if this is the right term, <br />but a propagation map that shows the distance that the signal travels in the area of overlap, that <br />that might be important to us. But, and I don€t have that before me except for in the form of <br />Exhibit I. But then if there was information that was presented at the hearing or in <br />correspondence between one of the parties and the Hearings Officer, I guess the question is to <br />Mr. Torigoe ƒ should we have that before us because reference is being made to it and I cannot <br />look at it? <br />ALAMEDA:Thank you. Mr. Torigoe? <br />TORIGOE:Well, certainly to the extent that you€re going to rely upon a Hearings <br />Officer€s recommendations or conclusions and, you know, you should have the underlying <br />information. So you should have a complete record before you. <br />ALAMEDA:Commissioner Springer? <br />SPRINGER:So, Mr. Chair, I have a concern that my record is not complete. <br />ALAMEDA:Fellow Commissioners, how would you -? Mr. Torigoe, well, how would <br />you resolve an incomplete record? <br />TORIGOE:Well, if the parties have the information that they can simply supply at this <br />point, then that can be entered into the record. <br />ALAMEDA:Is there any objection to that? <br />17EXHIBIT B <br /> <br />