My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2006-02-03 TCellco
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Leeward/Windward Planning Commission
>
Minutes & Exhibits Transcripts
>
2003-2022 Exhibits Transcripts
>
2006
>
2006-02-03 TCellco
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/13/2011 10:33:24 AM
Creation date
6/13/2011 10:32:52 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
36
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
TORIGOE:We may have it. <br />YOUNG:Okay, anyway, that map goes to show an antenna site at Ainaloa, how far <br />the signal would travel, and that a site there would not cover the gap that we need to go back to <br />Keaau. <br />ALAMEDA:Okay. Yes, Commissioner Springer? <br />SPRINGER:These images are not the same images that are in Exhibit I, which I think <br />is what we all have. <br />ALAMEDA:Okay. So it will be worth circulating. Thankyou. Thank you for that, <br />Commissioner Springer. So as that has been circulated -. Are there any other questions? <br />SIRACUSA:Yes. What is being circulated, theres three, theres four locations. One is <br />Mt.View,oneisKeaau,oneisPunaandoneisPahoa.IsthisproposedonePuna? <br />YOUNG:ThisisforPuna.TheothersshowthesurroundingVerizonsites. <br />SIRACUSA:Well,becausethoseotheronesarealsoinPuna,soIjustwantedtomake <br />sure that the one that says Puna here is the one thats under discussion. <br />YOUNG:Correct, yes. <br />SIRACUSA:Okay. <br />ALAMEDA:Commissioner Graham? <br />GRAHAM:Just an off-point comment but about the process here. I think <br />Mr. Watanabe was thinking it was coming to motion time. And I had thought from the <br />beginning we were going to ask questions and then perhaps we were going to have a closing <br />argument from each of the parties. Was that your understanding, Mr. Chairman or, before we do <br />motions? <br />ALAMEDA:Yeah, we could go, that will be the next kind of layer if we wanted to, to <br />even go to having the parties speak. Cause we have enough, we could as a Commission say, you <br />know, we have enough information before us to go ahead and make a motion and make a <br />decision on the now updated Hearings Officers report. Or we could go to the next level and say <br />lets have them all have a chance to make closing arguments, and then make a decision. So -. <br />GRAHAM:Im okay either way. <br />ALAMEDA:Okay. <br />WATANABE:Yeah, I had thought that we had limited it to just answering questions for <br />clarification purposes and that we were not into oral arguments. <br />19EXHIBIT B <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.