My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2006-02-03 TCellco
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Leeward/Windward Planning Commission
>
Minutes & Exhibits Transcripts
>
2003-2022 Exhibits Transcripts
>
2006
>
2006-02-03 TCellco
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/13/2011 10:33:24 AM
Creation date
6/13/2011 10:32:52 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
36
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
TORIGOE:Also, is there any public testimony that you need to take? <br />ALAMEDA:Question, Mr. Torigoe. I thought we werent allowing public testimony? <br />TORIGOE:No. Well, you know, you have to allow for public testimony in every -. <br />ALAMEDA:Okay. Oh, we do, okay. <br />TORIGOE:Contested case. <br />ALAMEDA:There is a testifier here by the name of Bob Ely. Do we have to do the <br />formal, have everybody sit down, or could he provide testimony where hes at? <br />TORIGOE:Well, hes here as a contested case party. I dont know that he intends to <br />dosomethingdifferentfrom,orsaysomethingdifferentfromwhathewouldsayasacontested <br />case party. But, you know, it being a contested case, if youre going to allow him to give <br />testimony or argument as it may be, then you probably need to allow the other parties to do the <br />same. <br />ALAMEDA:Yeah, fellow Commissioners, I am hesitant to allow Mr. Ely further <br />testimony cause then it will open it up for everybody else. I think we have the information, the <br />Hearing Officer did spend time with the parties. <br />WATANABE:Mr. Chairman? <br />TORIGOE:Is there -? <br />ALAMEDA:Commissioner Watanabe? <br />WATANABE:I would tend to agree except that if there are other individuals from the <br />public who would like to testify I think we are obliged to accept their testimony. But I would <br />agree that if we allow the intervenor to act as someone from the public to testify then we have to <br />go to oral arguments, because youre not providing equal opportunity. <br />SIRACUSA:He cant wear two hats. <br />LEITHEAD-TODD:Mr. Chair? <br />ALAMEDA:Yes, Ms. Leithead-Todd. <br />LEITHEAD-TODD:Both the intervenors and Mr. Young are not lawyers. Theyre not familiar <br />with the rules, and they may not have understood that they needed to put in a request for oral <br />argument. So what you may want to do is give them an opportunity to request an opportunity for <br />oral argument. I mean its just in fairness because theyre not familiar, theyre representing <br />themselves. And Im just thinking that if youre making the record and, you know, if theres any <br />potential for an appeal of this that you want to make as full a record as possible and give them <br />the opportunity if they so desire. <br />21EXHIBIT B <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.