My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2006-02-03 TCellco
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Leeward/Windward Planning Commission
>
Minutes & Exhibits Transcripts
>
2003-2022 Exhibits Transcripts
>
2006
>
2006-02-03 TCellco
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/13/2011 10:33:24 AM
Creation date
6/13/2011 10:32:52 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
36
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
ALAMEDA:Okay. Can I get the, there may be testimony, so Mr. Director, <br />Ms. Leithead-Todd, could I swear you in? <br />YUEN:Oh, Im sorry. I wasnt sworn in. <br />ALAMEDA:Would you please raise your hand. Do you swear or affirm to tell the truth <br />now before the Hawaii County Planning Commission? <br />YUEN:I do. <br />LEITHEAD-TODD:I do. <br />ALAMEDA:Thank you. For the applicant, could you please state your name and <br />address for the record. <br />YOUNG:My name is Les Young, address is 500 Ala Moana Boulevard in Honolulu, <br />Hawaii. <br />ALAMEDA:Okay,Iknowyouvebeenthroughthehearingandall.Arethereany <br />comments that youd like to share with us or any thoughts? <br />YOUNG:Well, you do have quite a bit of information already from the documents <br />in front of you. What Id like to do is just spend a few minutes giving you a very brief summary <br />of our proposal, and then make myself available for questions to then provide more specific <br />details to your questions. <br />ALAMEDA:I want to check with Corp. Counsel on, if you dont mind, on me getting <br />clarity on how best to proceed. Mr. Torigoe, could you kind of lay it out for us? <br />TORIGOE:Sure. Youre in a situation where you now have a report and <br />recommendations and a proposed findings from the Hearings Officer, you also have a proposed <br />findings from the Department, and you have some exceptions from the intervenor. So you have <br />all that to consider. Under your Rule 4-33 when there are exceptions filed, the Commission may <br />render its decision based on the record, all the material that you have, or you can allow for oral <br />argument by the parties. You also can reopen the docket and take further evidence. So you have <br />some flexibility in doing these things. At this point, so I guess the initial decision is do you want <br />to make a decision based only on the documents and the record that you have, or do you want to <br />allow for oral argument and possibly further questioning of the parties? If so, then you should <br />have a motion to do that. <br />ALAMEDA:All right, fellow Commissioners, we can vote, we can basically make a <br />motion on whats before us already, its Option 1. Option 2, we can allow for oral arguments <br />between the parties. And then Option 3, we could actually open it for testimony again. Whats <br />your pleasure? <br />SIRACUSA:Well -. <br />3EXHIBIT B <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.