My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2006-02-03 TRaymond
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Leeward/Windward Planning Commission
>
Minutes & Exhibits Transcripts
>
2003-2022 Exhibits Transcripts
>
2006
>
2006-02-03 TRaymond
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/13/2011 10:33:09 AM
Creation date
6/13/2011 10:32:57 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
22
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
ALAMEDA:Commissioner Watanabe? <br />WATANABE:For clarification, so then youre anticipating that you will sell the lots; and <br />based on the information the Director provided, youre looking at something like a half a million <br />that youre going to put down for affordable housing? <br />RAYMOND:Some, I mean, thats an arbitrary figure, but it is based on the sale price of <br />the lot at the time and what an affordable home is for a median family of four or earning their <br />median income. <br />WATANABE:Thank you. <br />ALAMEDA:Commissioner Iwashita? <br />IWASHITA:Soifyoufollowthatprocedure,thenwhatsyourunderstandingastohow <br />many lots the affordable housing in-lieu requirement would apply to? <br />RAYMOND:After talking to Planning Commissioner (sic) Yuen this morning, we still <br />have to work that out. I mean, its a vague area. The specific numbers that this is going to be <br />applied to, how many lots were going to have to provide affordable housing in relation to, at this <br />point, Im not sure. I initially thought four lots. Now were in negotiation, it appears we might <br />have to work something out; and the Council might have to work that issue out initially. <br />ALAMEDA:Commissioner Iwashita, follow-up? <br />IWASHITA:So its my impression that under the present interpretation expressed by <br />the Director its that the affordable housing requirement, in-lieu payment, would apply to four of <br />the lots, the first four sold? <br />YUEN:It would clearly apply to any sales at market. What we would do in a sale <br />where the person says, oh, I sold this for a $1 and love is something that we had never, is a detail <br />that we had not resolved; and I think that it needs to be resolved at the Council level and done, <br />you know, done in a blanket way. The situation where somebody is legitimately conveying a <br />piece of property that theyve had for a long time to a family member is a sympathetic one. But <br />as I mentioned a couple of minutes ago, if you say that that works all the time regardless of <br />circumstances, you are opening up a loophole where a developer can wash the initial transaction <br />and avoid the payment of an in-lieu fee and then the properties, ultimately sell the properties on <br />the market. You know, they can be sold right away by the family member to somebody else or it <br />can even be used as an estate planning tool by a land developer. So thats something where I <br />recognized this as an issue when we did the ordinance in February 2005 and we didnt come to a, <br />it was a level of detail that we didnt come to a final resolution on. <br />ALAMEDA:Commissioner Watanabe, and then Commissioner Iwashita. <br />WATANABE:I have a follow-up question for the Director. And you did mention you <br />would like that issue or that loophole resolved in general; and I would tend to agree. However, <br />with respect to this application, is there a way you think that we might word that condition, cause <br />9EXHIBIT A <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.