Laserfiche WebLink
ALAMEDA:Commissioner Watanabe? <br />WATANABE:For clarification, so then you€re anticipating that you will sell the lots; and <br />based on the information the Director provided, you€re looking at something like a half a million <br />that you€re going to put down for affordable housing? <br />RAYMOND:Some, I mean, that€s an arbitrary figure, but it is based on the sale price of <br />the lot at the time and what an affordable home‚ is for a median family of four or earning their <br />median income. <br />WATANABE:Thank you. <br />ALAMEDA:Commissioner Iwashita? <br />IWASHITA:Soifyoufollowthatprocedure,thenwhat€syourunderstandingastohow <br />many lots the affordable housing in-lieu requirement would apply to? <br />RAYMOND:After talking to Planning Commissioner (sic) Yuen this morning, we still <br />have to work that out. I mean, it€s a vague area. The specific numbers that this is going to be <br />applied to, how many lots we€re going to have to provide affordable housing in relation to, at this <br />point, I€m not sure. I initially thought four lots. Now we€re in negotiation, it appears we might <br />have to work something out; and the Council might have to work that issue out initially. <br />ALAMEDA:Commissioner Iwashita, follow-up? <br />IWASHITA:So it€s my impression that under the present interpretation expressed by <br />the Director it€s that the affordable housing requirement, in-lieu payment, would apply to four of <br />the lots, the first four sold? <br />YUEN:It would clearly apply to any sales at market. What we would do in a sale <br />where the person says, oh, I sold this for a $1 and love is something that we had never, is a detail <br />that we had not resolved; and I think that it needs to be resolved at the Council level and done, <br />you know, done in a blanket way. The situation where somebody is legitimately conveying a <br />piece of property that they€ve had for a long time to a family member is a sympathetic one. But <br />as I mentioned a couple of minutes ago, if you say that that works all the time regardless of <br />circumstances, you are opening up a loophole where a developer can wash the initial transaction <br />and avoid the payment of an in-lieu fee and then the properties, ultimately sell the properties on <br />the market. You know, they can be sold right away by the family member to somebody else or it <br />can even be used as an estate planning tool by a land developer. So that€s something where I <br />recognized this as an issue when we did the ordinance in February 2005 and we didn€t come to a, <br />it was a level of detail that we didn€t come to a final resolution on. <br />ALAMEDA:Commissioner Watanabe, and then Commissioner Iwashita. <br />WATANABE:I have a follow-up question for the Director. And you did mention you <br />would like that issue or that loophole resolved in general; and I would tend to agree. However, <br />with respect to this application, is there a way you think that we might word that condition, cause <br />9EXHIBIT A <br /> <br />