2022-05-05 Windward Exh C (Item 3 County Council Initiated PL-CCI-2022-001)

Home

schedule. The correct reference should be 291-72. The close quote after the word"statutes" at the end of the sentence is likely a typo. So, in this case, if you look at the document that Councilmember Kimball sent under her Section II.B of that document, she proposed amendments to address this recommendation to make the changes that the Director is recommending. So, the Director agrees with the proposed amendment and recommends that the Commission adopt this change. Under Director's recommendation 93 Section 3. Definitions. Consider changing the term "Networked charger"to match what's in the body of the bill. The reason for this is the term specifically as presented and that's "Networked charger" is not used anywhere in the body of the bill. The word"Networked" is used four(4)times and the term, "Network-capable" is used in the definition of"Direct current fast charger". So,the Director suggested to consider expanding the term "Networked charger"to include those alternative references. However, in Section 11. C of Councilmember Kimball's proposed amendments she addresses this recommendation by shortening the term to the word"Networked" and that would kind of similarly solve that situation. The Director agrees with this proposed amendment and recommends the Commission adopt this change. Recommendation 94 under Section 25-4-54.1(a). Again, in the Zoning Code that the bill should clarify the size or type of parking spaces required to be considered a dedicated electric vehicle parking space under the requirements of the bill. The reason for that is the Zoning Code allows for different types of parking stalls for compliance with our parking requirements for example there's a possibility of compact parking stalls which will likely not work for an EV charging station. So, Director recommended that the County Council consider adding the qualifier, full size or provide specific minimum dimensions required for a dedicated electric vehicle stall. In her proposed amendments in Section I.A. It was addressed by recommending adding the qualifier"standard size" for the type of required parking space. The Director agrees with this proposed amendment and recommends adopting this change to send up to the County Council. Furthermore, the Director recommends the "standard size" qualifier be added to Councilmember Kimball's proposed amendment under Section I.B. which we'll talk about next. So, under Section 25-4-54.1(a). The Director recommends that the bill should clarify that the number of electric vehicles designating parking stalls shall correspond to the maximum number of plugs required under the development schedule that's laid out in that section of the bill. The reason for this is the section is unclear as it is currently written that each required plug needs to correspond with the number of dedicated parking stalls. For example, after 2029 each increment of 50 parking stalls shall include eight(8) electric vehicle designated parking stalls because that's the same number of plugs that will be required at that time. In Section 1. A. of Councilmember Kimball's proposed amendments she addresses this recommendation by adding language indicating that the required number of electric vehicle stalls 5 EXHIBIT C