My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2010-02-05 TWITHERS
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Leeward/Windward Planning Commission
>
Minutes & Exhibits Transcripts
>
2003-2022 Exhibits Transcripts
>
2010
>
2010-02-05 TWITHERS
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/13/2011 10:53:49 AM
Creation date
6/13/2011 10:53:44 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
23
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
GONZALEZ: Mr. Chairman, may I ask for clarification? <br />WOODWARD: Yes, Mr. Gonzalez. <br />GONZALEZ: Can we change your term and use of “project area?” Because they’re not going <br />to know project area unless they get a metes and bounds. So is there an established project area <br />that you’re referring to in that sentence you added in the beginning? You know what I’m <br />saying? <br />IWASHITA: Well, I just, yeah, thank you. I just used that term because it was a term used in <br />the existing or proposed language for four. So whatever staff would recommend, if that needs <br />clarification, that’s fine with me. <br />GONZALEZ: Okay. So I just wanted to see, you were envisioning the project area now as <br />established in the prior plan or something, right? <br />IWASHITA: Yes. Well, yeah, in my mind and I guess because the proposed language for four <br />used the .668-acre project terminology, I just copied that in my language, yeah. <br />DOMINGO: Mr. Chairman? <br />WOODWARD: Yes, Commissioner Domingo.0 <br />DOMINGO: Mr. Chairman, I can see where the motion would amend or delete certain aspects <br />of the conditions. But what I’m concerned is that this being a special permit, and as I indicated <br />that, you know, when you apply for a special permit you’re beholden to certain specific <br />conditions, there’s no ifs or buts about it. And if there are changes in the conditions or the <br />contents of the special permit, would it not be more appropriate that they file for an amendment <br />to the permit, to the Special Permit? Because right now it kind of leaves it nebulous, and the <br />interpretation of what’s the intent of the Commission is questionable <br />WOODWARD: I’m not exactly sure what you’re asking, to be honest. <br />DOMINGO: What I’m saying is, okay, when I say nebulous, you know, if, if they find it a <br />necessity to expand the metes and bounds and the boundaries and where the operation now exist, <br />then they should come out with, I guess, a survey and a new metes and bounds to indicate that <br />they’ve done this. What I’m saying is that because they’re changing it, they’re changing the <br />specific, specifics of the condition, is it not more appropriate that they come in for an amendment <br />to the application? <br />WOODWARD: Well, maybe, I’ll give you my best shot at an answer. The question I think is <br />whether the addition of this 500-square foot area in the area that was previously mapped out in <br />their plan justifies a complete new plan. That’s sort of the crux of the matter. Now if there was <br />to be, my understanding is if there was to be any further changes beyond what is existing now, <br />then they would have to require, it would require either an amendment or a new special permit. <br />20 <br /> EXHIBIT A <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.