My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2010-02-05 TTAIS
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Leeward/Windward Planning Commission
>
Minutes & Exhibits Transcripts
>
2003-2022 Exhibits Transcripts
>
2010
>
2010-02-05 TTAIS
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/13/2011 10:54:02 AM
Creation date
6/13/2011 10:53:57 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
10
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
RECESSED The Chair recessed the meeting at this time, 12:40 p.m. <br />RECONVENED The meeting reconvened at 2:00 p.m. <br />WOODWARD: Okay, will the Windward Planning Commission please come back to order. <br />We are on Agenda Item No. 7. We have heard from the Planning Department, from the <br />applicant, and from the one public testifier. So we’re at the point to consider a motion if <br />somebody is of such mind. <br />IWASHITA: Mr. Chair? <br />WOODWARD: Yes, Commissioner Iwashita. <br />IWASHITA: On Item No. 7, Vincent T. C. Tai (REZ 09-114), change of zone from a Single- <br />Family Residential – 7,500 square feet (RS-7.5) to a Multiple-Family Residential – 2,500 square <br />feet (RM-2.5) district for approximately 3.292 acres of land tax map key 2-4-28:9, I move that <br />the Planning Commission forward a favorable recommendation on the change of zone request to <br />the County Council with, subject to the conditions set forth in the recommendation. <br />KERN: Second. <br />WOODWARD: All right, thank you. It has been moved and seconded. Do we have any <br />discussion? Commissioner Iwashita. <br />IWASHITA: I’d like to acknowledge a couple of things. First the work of the staff in preparing <br />this in doing the fine job that they always do.And, also, I’d like to acknowledge the letters from <br />the community regarding their concerns for the effects that the project will have on the <br />community. In making the motion basically in my view as I said earlier in another matter, the <br />ideal scenario for the development of Hilo and any urban center really is that we concentrate as <br />much of the needs of the community in the Urban core; and this area obviously is part of the <br />Urban core, the police station is right there, there are schools and all of that. So we do need, and <br />it’s a well known fact, I gues,s and understated that, you know, on this island we have a housing <br />shortage; and we do need more affordable housing. And this project comes with a representation <br />and actually the requirement that’s part of the conditions for providing affordable housing. I <br />think as a community we need to address all of these issues and in a role as Commissioner, that <br />I’ll serve here for a short while more, I’d like to think that I am aware, and keep that awareness <br />of the needs of the entire community in any of the matters that come before us. <br />On the plus side for this project is, or are the following points:One, that it does provide a higher <br />density of residential use which is necessary in order for the County to make best use of its <br />infrastructure, the roads and so forth. And, two, in this location as the neighbors know it’s a very <br />convenient location, you can walk to certain functions and access certain, you know, it’s possible <br />to walk to Longs Drugs from where you live here. So, you know, those kinds of considerations <br />to me are pluses. <br />8 <br /> EXHIBIT C <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.