My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2010-02-05 TTUTTLE HALE OHIA
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Leeward/Windward Planning Commission
>
Minutes & Exhibits Transcripts
>
2003-2022 Exhibits Transcripts
>
2010
>
2010-02-05 TTUTTLE HALE OHIA
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/13/2011 10:54:14 AM
Creation date
6/13/2011 10:54:06 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
28
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
DARROW: Okay, maybe what, if it’s okay with Commissioner Iwashita, when the applicant <br />comes up we can identify specifically the amount of spaces. But when we had done the site <br />inspection there was a parking area in this general location that appeared to accommodate five or <br />more vehicles. There was a parking area in this area that accommodated approximately three <br />vehicles. There was one here that accommodated approximately three vehicles, as well as a <br />covered garage here that accommodated three vehicles. And I believe that the applicant also <br />owns this property here which seemed to have parking on that property as well. But -. <br />IWASHITA: But if, that garage structure, it appears to encroach on the road. I wouldn’t want to <br />approve parking that encroached on the road. <br />DARROW: I think the garage is, the carport is going to remain? We can ask the -. If, it’s my <br />understanding, I’m not sure if that’s going to be removed. But, again, this might be one of those <br />nonconforming structures. But even without this parking area here there was ample parking for <br />both bed and breakfasts. <br />WOODWARD: Commissioner Domingo? <br />DOMINGO: Yes. Jeff, you know, you mentioned that the adjacent properties on both sides <br />were owned by the applicant. <br />DARROW: I believe these, there are two parcels here. Is that correct, Mr. Tuttle? These two <br />parcels here are owned by the applicant and they’re -. <br />DOMINGO: And they’re both zoned 20,000? <br />DARROW: RS-20. <br />DOMINGO: RS-20. What would preclude the owners of the property to apply for further bed <br />and breakfasts on each parcel? <br />DARROW: Well, they could. That would probably be a question for the applicant as to whether <br />he will. I’m not sure at that point if the Commission would consider an additional bed and <br />breakfast for this particular area, but there’s always the possibility. <br />DOMINGO: If they, nothing would prevent them from doing it? <br />DARROW: Correct. <br />DOMINGO: Okay, they can apply for it. As it stands right now it provides for five bed and <br />breakfasts. And assuming that five parties would come and that would mean five cars, so we’re <br />looking at ten cars. And assuming, assuming that those people who come are either couples and, <br />who knows, probably children.So we’re looking at per bed and breakfast approximately ten <br />individuals also, five cars per bed and breakfast and ten people per bed and breakfast. So we’re <br />looking at 10 cars, a possibility of 20 people congregated there in that bed and breakfast, right? <br />7 <br /> EXHIBIT D <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.