2003-02-07 tpuaa - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

businesses there that are in The Pines commercial area, whether itÓs -. And I donÓt why, but they have pizza place, and eating places in there, frankly. But if thereÓs a little store, they could go to that. Otherwise, they have to get in a car and, or they could walk. But the only other way to get there is to go out to Hualalai, come down to the intersection and then come back up. ItÓll be an amenity and in keeping with the general idea of letting people in residential areas, particularly those who have higher densities, be able to walk to amenities in their immediate neighborhood. I think, and to the extent that there may be a legal problem with this, Òcause IÓm not sure what the rights are, I think we would say they have to use their best efforts to secure those -. ÒCause IÓm not sure of the status of the roads in The Pines. In other words, whether we can hookup like that because of -. TOGASHI:Did The Pines also include curbs, gutters and sidewalks, too, up to and leading to the commercial store? YUEN:No. The Pines is under a Planned Unit Development. They h they donÓt have sidewalks. They have a road curb. They have, they require cul-de-sac streets, the road curb with peopleÓs yards going up to the edge of the road curb. But itÓs not a, the streets are quite safe to walk on in The Pines. ThereÓs very little cross traffic and -. GALDONES:Any further discussion or questions to Daryn? ARAI:Mr. Chairman? GALDONES:Yes, Daryn? ARAI:IÓm sorry, if they wouldnÓt mind, thinking on the sly as we we make just a few other minor changes to Condition H? GALDONES:What would the changes be? ARAI:Where it says, ÐShould development,Ñ instead of saying Ðdevelopment,Ñ if we can replace ÐdevelopmentÑ by this phrase, ÐShould actual constructionÈ.Ñ And the reason for that is ÐdevelopmentÑ is sort of nebulous. So I think itÓs better to say ÐÈactual construction of the subject property not commence within three (3) yearsÈÑ And further down in that same sentence where it makes reference to ÐIndependent Living Residential Community,Ñ if you can take that phrase out, ÐIndependent Living Residential Community,Ñ and replace with this passage: Ðhousing development restricted to qualified elderly persons under 42 U.S.C., Section 3607.Ñ KUBOTA:Try that again, that part, Ðhousing development -.Ñ ARAI:ÐHousing development restricted to qualified elderly persons under 42 U.S.C., Section 3607.Ñ 11