2003-02-07 tpuaa - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

YUEN:The H would say, ÐShould actual construction of the subject property not commence within one (1) year from Final Plan ApprovalÈor should such development,Ñ etc. Okay? And what this would do is the following: They have five years to get Final Plan Approval. If they get Final Plan Approval within the five years and they start construction within a year of that, then they donÓt have to do a new traffic study. KUBOTA:Okay. YUEN:Right. If they ask for an extension of time for the Final Approval, another five years, they can get that extension of time but they will have to do a new traffic study -. KUBOTA:TIAR. YUEN:Because the extension of time will not apply to Condition H KUBOTA:Okay. GALDONES:Okay, Daryn, moving on, sorry for the interruption. ARAI:Condition J on page 3. It speaks, we would not support the ApplicantÓs proposed changes to this condition. In consultation with Public Works, it is clear that a drainage study is recommended prior to any development of this property. So, I guess, the issue of whether it will or will not is not an issue. It will be required. It is also, I should emphasize that regarding the master, the storm sewer system in the Master Plan for Kailua-Kona, it just says, Ðincluding an assessment,Ñ it doesnÓt say to do it. So, again, I donÓt see a problem with why they canÓt even address it as an assessment. Now, if Council or some department or administrative policy determines that the storm sewer recommended by the Master Plan will not be implemented, then that is something that can be incorporated within the drainage study as part of its assessment of what theyÓre going to do. So, and IÓve spoken to Kiran Emler of Public Works just a few mi also not in support of the suggested changes and would prefer to leave the language as is. YUEN:And to add to that, this is the concern: Back in 1994, the County had a big study done by R.M. Towill called, resulted in a Master Plan for Kailua-Kona. It showed on, one of the things they did was a master drainage plan that showed two large sedimentation basins on this property as their recommended drainage plan, up against the Queen Kaahumanu Highway corridor. It also showed, am I correct on this, Daryn, a sedimentation basin on the University of NationsÓ property. At this point, IÓm not sure of the analysis that went into that and why they came out with that result. However, we did suggest the same condition on the department level at the University of Nations and it was taken out by the Council. We are concerned about what is the drainage master plan 25