My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2007-02-15 twaikoloadevco
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Leeward/Windward Planning Commission
>
Minutes & Exhibits Transcripts
>
2003-2022 Exhibits Transcripts
>
2007
>
2007-02-15 twaikoloadevco
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/13/2011 11:00:27 AM
Creation date
6/13/2011 11:00:23 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
24
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
ALAMEDA: Mr. Chair. <br />GRAHAM: Yes, Commissioner Alameda? <br />ALAMEDA: Thank you, Mr. Chair. The discussion is kind of moving into what we <br />would typically do after a motion or maybe previous to a motion, maybe because we don’t know <br />what to make a motion on. So I’d just like to maybe encourage Commissioners maybe we could <br />move that way, and start having our full discussion with each other. Go ahead. <br />GRAHAM: Yeah, I’m certainly in accord with that, that we move towards the <br />completion of this Application. Yes, Commissioner Watanabe? <br />WATANABE: I’d like to make a motion cause I tend to agree. I move that Amendment <br />to Special Management Area Use Permit No. 25 – SMA 25 – be approved with an amendment to <br />Condition 26, which references to the integrated golf course management plan for the second <br />golf course, and I move that we approve this based on the Director’s recommendations. <br />GALDONES: Second. <br />GRAHAM: Thank you. Moved by Commissioner Watanabe, seconded by <br />Commissioner Galdones. Do we have further discussion? <br />ALAMEDA: Discussion. <br />GRAHAM: Discussion, Commissioner Alameda. <br />ALAMEDA: Thank you, Mr. Chair. I appreciate Dr. Walsh’s interpretation of the data <br />and the questions brought up by you, Mr. Chair. But I’m sitting here, looking at the Applicant <br />and thinking, you know, where did they maybe go wrong in their preparation. And just from <br />sitting here, I’m thinking that they did pretty much everything that they had to do to prepare for <br />this Application and to present today. And so our discussion is more around like – so what do <br />we do. And how do we judge this Application then? Do we judge on kind of what was <br />presented or on this global warming kind of environmental issue? And what I hear so far is that, <br />like the Department of Health they do water quality monitoring, so, okay. But what I’m hearing <br />is that maybe they should even do some sewage monitoring, some sediment monitoring, they <br />should be looking at the balance or health of the reef, you know, the monitoring there, but they <br />don’t. So is that the fault of the Applicant? I don’t know. So for me, I’m here sitting and <br />thinking that I think the Applicant has done everything that they needed to do; this is a follow-up <br />continuance from the previous meeting. And I’m inclined to be in favor of the motion because <br />of that. <br />GRAHAM: Thank you, Commissioner Alameda. Any comments from other <br />Commissioners? Commissioner Iwashita? <br />IWASHITA: My concern is that – and I appreciate everything Commissioner Alameda <br />says and we have to look at the practical aspects of, you know, this is a request for an extension, <br />and these are conditions on an SMA. And so I think that, in my mind anyway, the way I look at <br />EXHIBIT C <br />17 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.