Laserfiche WebLink
DARROW: Commissioner Iwashita? <br />IWASHITA: No. <br />DARROW: Commissioner Rho? <br />RHO: Aye. <br />DARROW: And Mr. Chairman. <br />GRAHAM: No. <br />DARROW: The motion does not pass, four to two. <br />GRAHAM: All right, thank you. So I’ll check with Mr. Torigoe, but I believe in such <br />situations we have sort of automatic continuance to our next West Hawaii, then we’ll have a <br />different set, perhaps, of Planning Commissioners to some degree. <br />TORIGOE: Yeah, what normally happens under the SMA Rules, basically you have a <br />reasonable time not to exceed 30 calendar days after conclusion of the hearing or within a longer <br />period as may be agreed by the applicant, you have to render a decision.So assuming that the <br />Applicants would like to have you reconvene to see if you can come to a five-vote decision, then <br />you would go ahead and continue. <br />GRAHAM: Is that acceptable to the Applicants that we wait our next meeting and <br />continue this hearing again? <br />W. YUEN: That’s acceptable to Waikoloa Homesites Venture. <br />GRAHAM: Thank you, Mr. Yuen. <br />BAIL: I’m waiting for a response from my client. We would like a decision <br />today, and we do not request that it be continued. <br />GRAHAM: Okay. Mr. Torigoe, how would we proceed? <br />TORIGOE: Well, there would have to be five votes either up or down, and it does not <br />appear that there is one. On the current state of the record, there is a possibility that someone <br />could introduce a different set of conditions and try for a different motion. <br />GRAHAM: Commissioner Alameda, you had a suggestion? <br />ALAMEDA: Thank you, Mr. Chair. I was going to say maybe the Applicant is not <br />aware of how, you know, the process. So if the consultant could maybe educate them around <br />that. Because basically we can’t make a decision because we don’t have five votes either way. <br />GRAHAM: Ms. Bail, is there anything you need clarified or -? <br />EXHIBIT C <br />21 <br /> <br />